Closed wesselvdv closed 3 years ago
/area provider/openstack
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle rotten
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle rotten
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/reopen
/remove-lifecycle rotten
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue.
I am trying to use a terraform provider for kOps with Openstack, and I am running into an issue with that’s caused by the code below:
https://github.com/kubernetes/kops/blob/466877c8d5105e8cf11dfaa8a4868924d316ec9d/upup/pkg/fi/cloudup/openstack/cloud.go#L555-L582
from my understanding there’s no such thing as a subnet in a specific availability zone for Openstack. This makes it damn near impossible to provide a network/subnet combination to said terraform provider I am using because I don’t know what kind of subnet/zone combination kOps is expecting. (the provider requires me to setup the network and subsequent subnets manually, and pass ‘m in)
I made an issue in said repo (here) , but I found out it’s due to the line of code I referenced to above.
I think it’s not doing anything useful, but I don’t know enough to say that removing it would have no ill effects.