Open endocrimes opened 3 years ago
There is an old issue for this and the PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/99606
We can keep either. I like the checkboxes in this issue
Oh I missed the issue reference and github-search-foo failed me - fine with either 😅
cleaned up duplicates
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle rotten
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove lifecycle state /lifecycle frozen
@endocrimes are you still working on this? If not, you can unassign yourself so someone else can take it.
/unassign @endocrimes
/triage accepted
/cc @AnishShah
/kind cleanup /sig node /area test /priority important-longterm /assign
Currently, node_e2e configuration exists in the
jenkins/
directory underneath node_e2e. This directory is a hangover from the time before Kubernetes migrated to Prow. This directory is regularly a point of contention when adding new features to tests, and causes confusion to people trying to make changes to them.We should remove the unused portions of this directory and rename it to something more useful (
e2e_node/configuration
?) to simplify future changes while maintaining the current developer workflow.This is going to involve coordinating a couple of things between k/k and k/test-infra to ensure that we do not cause a break in tests during the migration process and to not break running tests against older release branches.
My naive suggestion for handling this would be:
(@spiffxp / @dims might have better suggestions for how to handle this?)