Open FengyunPan2 opened 3 months ago
This issue is currently awaiting triage.
If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted
label and provide further guidance.
The triage/accepted
label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted
in a comment.
/assign
/sig node
do we have more precise numbers about the (in)efficiency? for example, a graph of pod count vs execution time
do we have more precise numbers about the (in)efficiency? for example, a graph of pod count vs execution time
I agree with @ffromani it would be nice to see how the new patch improves things.
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
What would you like to be added?
Use a single List api instead of multiple Get api.
Why is this needed?
My k8s node is a big machine(500C CPU & 2000GB Memory), the maxPods of kubelet could be set to 200+. When I delete 200+ pods or create 200+ pods, the synchronization of Pod status by the kubelet becomes too slow(about 230s). Making a large number of GET API calls can indeed increase the load on the API server.