Closed JeremyOT closed 4 years ago
+1 from me!
Wouldn't it be better to have a full name? such as multi-cluster-service-api
?
I don't have strong preference for the name (multi-cluster-service-api would be fine), but shorter seems better
/assign @pmorie
I also prefer shorter, I'm +1 on creating this repo now that the direction seems to be reasonably settled.
Thanks! I believe with that we have the approval we need
/assign
Repo has been created - https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/mcs-api
Also created:
Once both PRs merge, we can close this issue.
https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/5022 has merged. Closing.
New Repo, Staging Repo, or migrate existing
New repo
Requested name for new repository
sigs.k8s.io/mcs-api
Which Organization should it reside
kubernetes-sigs
If not a staging repo, who should have admin access
@pmorie @JeremyOT
If not a staging repo, who should have write access
@pmorie @JeremyOT
If not a staging repo, who should be listed as approvers in OWNERS
@pmorie @JeremyOT
If not a staging repo, who should be listed in SECURITY_CONTACTS
@pmorie @JeremyOT
What should the repo description be
This repository hosts the Multi-Cluster Service APIs. Providers can import packages in this repo to ensure their multi-cluster service controller implementations will be compatible with MCS data planes.
What SIG and subproject does this fall under in sigs.yaml
This is part of a new Multi-Cluster Services subproject for
sig-multicluster
calledmcs-api
Approvals
@pmorie
Additional context for request
KEP: 1645 Discussion on approaches: http://bit.ly/k8s-mcs-repo-discussion Thread: https://groups.google.com/forum/?oldui=1#!topic/kubernetes-sig-architecture/tzn9cfULDfw