kubernetes / steering

The Kubernetes Steering Committee
Apache License 2.0
84 stars 59 forks source link

GB Rep term should match SC terms #218

Open parispittman opened 2 years ago

parispittman commented 2 years ago

Problem Statement

GB rep is 2 years, Steering rep is 2 years but they are not concurrent. It would be a smoother process if they were concurrent with the person elected to GBs Steering term. If they are not, the person will have ~1 year where they need to make sure they link up with steering, ask to be fit into the agenda, etc; whereas, they would already be in those meetings if they still sat on Steering.

We also include emeritus members in the process for GB which in my experience would also be hard because that person would need to be extremely active in the community still.

Proposed Solution

Open Questions

Next Steps

k8s-triage-robot commented 2 years ago

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

You can:

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

mrbobbytables commented 2 years ago

/remove-lifecycle stale /lifecycle frozen

parispittman commented 2 years ago

spoke about second option with adding an alternative that is on a different term cycle at the last Steering Committee meeting http://bit.ly/k8s-steering-wd

@caniszczyk - what's our next step with adding an alt to the k8s rep GB role? steering is in favor of adding.

BenTheElder commented 4 months ago

cc @cblecker

I think currently what we've resolved to instead is to make sure we have steering + GB rep communication channels and are relatively OK with the non-aligned terms.