search

kubernetes / test-infra

Test infrastructure for the Kubernetes project.
Apache License 2.0
3.83k stars 2.64k forks source link

k8s-triage-robot should not be closing important bugs #25967

Open wojtek-t opened 2 years ago

wojtek-t commented 2 years ago

We were just chatting with @liggitt about reliability bar and one of the AIs from the discussions was to ensure that important bugs actually aren't closed.

Basically, any issue that is marked with: kind/bug priority/{important-soon,important-longterm,critical-urgent}

should not be touched by k8s-triage-robot for marking as state/rotten/closed

Couple different jobs in this file have to be updated to do this. https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/blob/705997b53f349731aa03c355c50637af574a2917/config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-k8s-infra/trusted/sig-contribex-k8s-triage-robot.yaml#L133

Summarizing later discussion, the AIs are:

@kubernetes/sig-contributor-experience /help wanted

wojtek-t commented 2 years ago

/sig contributor-experience

liggitt commented 2 years ago

xref https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/103151

I agree with this scoped starting point. A confirmed bug that is marked important/critical should not be autoclosed.

liggitt commented 2 years ago

I could actually see the stale/rotten labels being useful/interesting to indicate inactivity/neglect, but not auto-closing

wojtek-t commented 2 years ago

I could actually see the stale/rotten labels being useful/interesting to indicate inactivity/neglect, but not auto-closing

+1 - didn't think about it but it makes perfect sense

Also thanks for cross-referencing. Adding some folks here explicitly then: @dims @BenTheElder @sftim @ehashman @spiffxp

liggitt commented 2 years ago

for reference, here's a query of the closed lifecycle/rotten bugs with important or critical priority: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed+label%3Alifecycle%2Frotten+label%3Akind%2Fbug+label%3Apriority%2Fimportant-longterm%2Cpriority%2Fimportant-soon%2Cpriority%2Fcritical-urgent+

wojtek-t commented 2 years ago

Should we just go ahead and reopen them? [Not now, but after changing the bot]

BenTheElder commented 2 years ago

The bot does search queries so changing them is trivial, but up to contributor experience to approve.

I think the problem is "confirmed" bug.

E.g. you could just apply /lifecycle frozen to accepted bugs but anyone can do this. It's also true for /kind bug and /priority critival-urgent though.

sftim commented 2 years ago

I'd be happy to see accepted issues never closing, or rotting with a much longer interval (eg 12 months). We can still explicitly freeze key issues.

mrbobbytables commented 2 years ago

I agree that keeping their lifecycle state is useful knowledge, and I believe bugs labeled with triage/accepted not closing is an acceptable middle-ground. Only org members can use the command, so I think there is sufficient gating to prevent abuse.

IMO - It's probably worth sending to the contribex/k-dev mailing lists+community meeting this week for broader discussion.

jberkus commented 2 years ago

.... or even adding it to the Community Meeting agenda.

wojtek-t commented 2 years ago

We just discussed that during the community meeting.

The outcome was that:

  1. we want to proceed with not closing issues that are what's originally proposed + triage/accepted
  2. we want to ensure that SIGs are actually triaging issues
  3. we want to ensure that issues that don't have SIG assigned are also triaged
  4. we want to additionally provide some customization for timelines (e.g. enhancements repo wants more than 3 months for getting stale)

All of those are valid requests, but we shouldn't block (1) on the other.

So

here is the query (for k/k example) of the issues that should NOT be closed:

https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues?q=is%3Aissue+-label%3Alifecycle%2Ffrozen+label%3Alifecycle%2Frotten+label%3Akind%2Fbug+label%3Atriage%2Faccepted+label%3Apriority%2Fcritical-urgent%2Cpriority%2Fimportant-soon%2Cpriority%2Fimportant-longterm+

here is the query that is used currently: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues?q=is%3Aissue+-label%3Alifecycle%2Ffrozen+label%3Alifecycle%2Frotten

But I didn't yet figure out how to get the diff from those two. Any hints?

cblecker commented 2 years ago

The configuration of the bot is here: https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/blob/master/config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-k8s-infra/trusted/sig-contribex-k8s-triage-robot.yaml

cblecker commented 2 years ago

The process of recording consensus and notifying folks is here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/sig-contributor-experience/charter.md#cross-cutting-and-externally-facing-processes

wojtek-t commented 2 years ago

@cblecker - thanks; the announcement have been sent in: https://groups.google.com/a/kubernetes.io/g/leads/c/PYjDxRh8ghQ

k8s-triage-robot commented 2 years ago

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

You can:

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

wojtek-t commented 2 years ago

/remove-lifecycle stale

There are still things to do described in: https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/25967#issuecomment-1105612832

jberkus commented 2 years ago

Can you render that as a checklist in the original issue comment so that everyone knows what still needs to be done? Thanks!

wojtek-t commented 2 years ago

Can you render that as a checklist in the original issue comment so that everyone knows what still needs to be done? Thanks!

Done

k8s-triage-robot commented 1 year ago

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

You can:

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

marcindulak commented 1 year ago

:eyes:

wojtek-t commented 1 year ago

/remove-lifecycle stale

k8s-triage-robot commented 1 year ago

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

You can:

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

wojtek-t commented 1 year ago

/remove-lifecycle stale

k8s-triage-robot commented 1 year ago

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

You can:

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

wojtek-t commented 1 year ago

/remove-lifecycle stale

BenTheElder commented 4 months ago

@wojtek-t do we have any further changes to discuss here?

we have a few related issues and I think it's gotten scattered over time ...