fixed panic

[dwertent]

Type

bug_fix

---

Description

• Fixed a potential panic in the ScanCVE function in core/services/scan.go. The panic could occur when cvep.Content is nil and cve was retrieved from storage. Now, cve.Content is initialized with an empty GrypeDocument object in this case, preventing a null pointer dereference.

---

PR changes walkthrough

Relevant files

Bug fix

1 files scan.go                                                                                                          core/services/scan.go **The change is in the `ScanCVE` function. The code has been modified to initialize `cve.Content` with an empty `GrypeDocument` object when `cvep.Content` is `nil` and `cve` was retrieved from storage. This prevents a potential panic due to null pointer dereference.** +2/-1

---

User description

Overview

[codiumai-pr-agent-free[bot]]

PR Description updated to latest commit (https://github.com/kubescape/kubevuln/commit/e5c36ffe788ced03627c819bd2e7ca3b9a28e897)

[codiumai-pr-agent-free[bot]]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: Fixing a potential panic in the ScanCVE function

• 📝 PR summary: This PR addresses a potential panic in the ScanCVE function in core/services/scan.go. The panic could occur when cvep.Content is nil and cve was retrieved from storage. The fix involves initializing cve.Content with an empty GrypeDocument object in this case, preventing a null pointer dereference.

• 📌 Type of PR: Bug fix

• 🧪 Relevant tests added: No

• ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 1, because the PR is small and the change is straightforward.

• 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

  PR Feedback

• 💡 General suggestions: The PR is straightforward and addresses a specific issue. It would be beneficial to include tests that verify the fix and prevent the issue from reoccurring in the future.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  ---

  relevant file	core/services/scan.go
  suggestion	Consider adding a comment explaining why `cve.Content` is being initialized with an empty `GrypeDocument` object. This will help future developers understand the reasoning behind this line of code. [medium]
  relevant line	cve.Content = &v1beta1.GrypeDocument{}

  ---

How to use

Instructions

> To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: > **/review**: Request a review of your Pull Request. > **/describe**: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. > **/improve [--extended]**: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. > **/ask \**: Ask a question about the PR. > **/update_changelog**: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. > **/add_docs**: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. > **/generate_labels**: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. > see the [tools guide](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/docs/TOOLS_GUIDE.md) for more details. >To edit any configuration parameter from the [configuration.toml](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml), add --config_path=new_value. >For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..." >To list the possible configuration parameters, add a **/config** comment.

[github-actions[bot]]

Summary:

• License scan: failure
• Credentials scan: success
• Vulnerabilities scan: failure
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success