send full report

[dwertent]

Type

bug_fix

---

Description

This PR includes a bug fix in the ScanCVE function in the core/services/scan.go file. The main changes include:

• Removal of the cveRetrievedFromStorage variable which was used to check if the CVE was retrieved from storage.
• Removal of the condition that checked this variable and sent an empty report if cveRetrievedFromStorage was true and cvep.Content was nil.
• Removal of the import statement for github.com/kubescape/storage/pkg/apis/softwarecomposition/v1beta1.

---

PR changes walkthrough

Relevant files

Bug_fix

1 files scan.go                                                                                                          core/services/scan.go **The changes in this file are primarily focused on the `ScanCVE` function. The variable `cveRetrievedFromStorage` has been removed, which was previously used to check if the CVE was retrieved from storage. The condition that checked this variable and sent an empty report if `cveRetrievedFromStorage` was true and `cvep.Content` was nil has also been removed. The import statement for `github.com/kubescape/storage/pkg/apis/softwarecomposition/v1beta1` has been removed as well.** +0/-9

---

User description

Overview

[codiumai-pr-agent[bot]]

PR Description updated to latest commit (https://github.com/kubescape/kubevuln/commit/5c93fb9ccde92b4584f73864e3254b45a3bd603a)

[codiumai-pr-agent[bot]]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: Bug fix in the ScanCVE function

• 📝 PR summary: This PR addresses a bug in the ScanCVE function in the scan.go file. It removes the variable cveRetrievedFromStorage and the condition that checked this variable and sent an empty report if cveRetrievedFromStorage was true and cvep.Content was nil. It also removes the import statement for github.com/kubescape/storage/pkg/apis/softwarecomposition/v1beta1.

• 📌 Type of PR: Bug fix

• 🧪 Relevant tests added: No

• ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 2, because the changes are straightforward and limited to one function in one file.

• 🔒 Security concerns: No

  PR Feedback

• 💡 General suggestions: The changes seem to be addressing the issue at hand. However, it would be beneficial to add tests to ensure that the changes do not introduce new bugs and that the function behaves as expected after the changes.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  ---

  relevant file	core/services/scan.go
  suggestion	Consider adding error handling for the case when cve.Content is still nil after the scanning and storing process. This could prevent potential null pointer exceptions. [important]
  relevant line	if cve.Content == nil {

  ---

  relevant file	core/services/scan.go
  suggestion	It would be beneficial to add logging statements in the function to track the progress and to help with debugging in the future. [medium]
  relevant line	func (s *ScanService) ScanCVE(ctx context.Context) error {

  ---

  How to use

  Instructions

  > To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: > **/review**: Request a review of your Pull Request. > **/describe**: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. > **/improve [--extended]**: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. > **/ask \**: Ask a question about the PR. > **/update_changelog**: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. > **/add_docs**: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. > **/generate_labels**: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. > see the [tools guide](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/docs/TOOLS_GUIDE.md) for more details. >To edit any configuration parameter from the [configuration.toml](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml), add --config_path=new_value. >For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..." >To list the possible configuration parameters, add a **/config** comment.

[github-actions[bot]]

Summary:

• License scan: failure
• Credentials scan: success
• Vulnerabilities scan: failure
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success