Summary api objects

[rcohencyberarmor]

PR Type:

Enhancement

---

PR Description:

This PR introduces the support for Vulnerability Summary API objects. The new type, VulnerabilitySummary, is added along with the relevant files. This type is not stored in the storage, it is always regenerated for every K8S GET API. All other K8S API to this object will return an error claiming that the current API used is not supported. The PR also includes tests for the new functionality.

---

PR Main Files Walkthrough:

pkg/registry/file/vulnsummarystorage_test.go: This file contains the tests for the VulnerabilitySummaryStorage. It tests the Create, Delete, Watch, GetList, GuaranteedUpdate, Count, and Get methods, all of which are expected to return an error as they are not supported for this object. pkg/generated/openapi/zz_generated.openapi.go: This file contains the OpenAPI definitions for the new VulnerabilitySummary type. pkg/generated/clientset/versioned/typed/softwarecomposition/v1beta1/fake/fake_softwarecomposition_client.go: This file contains the fake client for the VulnerabilitySummary type, used for testing. pkg/registry/file/vulnsummarystorage.go: This file contains the implementation of the VulnerabilitySummaryStorage. It includes the methods for Create, Delete, Watch, GetList, GuaranteedUpdate, Count, and Get. All of these methods return an error as they are not supported for this object. pkg/apis/softwarecomposition/v1beta1/zz_generated.conversion.go: This file contains the auto-generated conversion functions for the VulnerabilitySummary type. pkg/apis/softwarecomposition/types_test.go: This file contains the tests for the types in the softwarecomposition API. pkg/generated/clientset/versioned/typed/softwarecomposition/v1beta1/vulnerabilitysummary.go: This file contains the client for the VulnerabilitySummary type. pkg/generated/clientset/versioned/typed/softwarecomposition/v1beta1/fake/fake_vulnerabilitysummary.go: This file contains the fake client for the VulnerabilitySummary type, used for testing. pkg/generated/listers/softwarecomposition/v1beta1/vulnerabilitysummary.go: This file contains the lister for the VulnerabilitySummary type. pkg/generated/informers/externalversions/softwarecomposition/v1beta1/vulnerabilitysummary.go: This file contains the informer for the VulnerabilitySummary type.

---

User Description:

support vuln summary object:

1. add new type VulnerabilitySummary and generate relevant files (new type doc: https://cyberarmor-io.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/RD/pages/216727553/Summary+vuln+object+CRD+modification)
2. this type is not actually store in the storage, it is always regenerate for every K8S GET API
3. all of other K8S API to this object will return error that claims that the current API used is not supported

[codiumai-pr-agent[bot]]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: Adding support for vulnerability summary objects in the Kubescape storage

• 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement

• 🧪 Relevant tests added: True

• ✨ Focused PR: True

• 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

  PR Feedback

• General suggestions: The PR seems well-structured and focused on a specific enhancement. The code is well-organized and follows good practices. It would be beneficial to add more comments in the code to explain complex parts and improve maintainability.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  • relevant file: pkg/registry/file/vulnsummarystorage_test.go suggestion: Consider using table-driven tests for the repeated test cases in the file. This will make the tests more readable and maintainable. [medium] relevant line: func TestVulnSummaryStorageImpl_Count(t *testing.T) {

  • relevant file: pkg/registry/file/vulnsummarystorage_test.go suggestion: It's a good practice to handle errors explicitly. Even in test files, ignoring errors using '' can lead to unexpected behavior. Consider handling these errors. [medium] relevant line: [ = afero.WriteFile(fs, DefaultStorageRoot+f, []byte(""), 0644)](https://github.com/kubescape/storage/pull/37/files#diff-d0421cede39793c51a136aa73a02745842686cfc02e85c90938252f76b786e33R60)

  • relevant file: pkg/registry/file/vulnsummarystorage_test.go suggestion: Consider using constants for repeated string values such as "/spdx.softwarecomposition.kubescape.io/sbomspdxv2p3s". This will make the code more maintainable and less prone to errors. [medium] relevant line: key: "/spdx.softwarecomposition.kubescape.io/sbomspdxv2p3s",

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option. /describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. /ask \<QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.

To edit any configuration parameter from 'configuration.toml', add --config_path=new_value For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..." To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

[rcohencyberarmor]

@vladklokun for now we are not going to support cluster scope, just namespace scope.

[github-actions[bot]]

Summary:

• License scan: success
• Credentials scan: success
• Vulnerabilities scan: success
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: failure

[github-actions[bot]]

Summary:

• License scan: success
• Credentials scan: success
• Vulnerabilities scan: success
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: failure

[codiumai-pr-agent[bot]]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: This PR introduces support for Vulnerability Summary API objects in the software composition package.

• 📝 PR summary: The PR adds a new type, VulnerabilitySummary, along with relevant files and tests. This type is not stored in the storage, it is always regenerated for every K8S GET API. All other K8S API to this object will return an error claiming that the current API used is not supported.

• 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement

• 🧪 Relevant tests added: Yes

• 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

  PR Feedback

• 💡 General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and includes comprehensive tests for the new functionality. It would be beneficial to ensure that all newly added methods are properly documented for better code readability and maintenance. Additionally, consider handling errors locally within each function, rather than returning them to the caller, to provide more specific error messages and make debugging easier.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  • relevant file: pkg/registry/file/vulnsummarystorage_test.go suggestion: Consider adding more test cases to cover different scenarios and edge cases. This will ensure that the code is robust and can handle unexpected inputs or states. [medium] relevant line: func TestVulnSummaryStorageImpl_Create(t *testing.T) {

  • relevant file: pkg/registry/file/vulnsummarystorage_test.go suggestion: It's a good practice to use table-driven tests in Go, which you have done here. However, consider adding more descriptive test names to make it easier to understand what each test is checking. [medium] relevant line: tests := []struct {

  • relevant file: pkg/generated/clientset/versioned/typed/softwarecomposition/v1beta1/fake/fake_vulnerabilitysummary.go suggestion: It's recommended to handle errors locally within each function, rather than returning them to the caller. This way, you can provide more specific error messages and make debugging easier. [medium] relevant line: func (c FakeVulnerabilitySummaries) Get(ctx context.Context, name string, options v1.GetOptions) (result v1beta1.VulnerabilitySummary, err error) {

  • relevant file: pkg/generated/clientset/versioned/typed/softwarecomposition/v1beta1/fake/fake_vulnerabilitysummary.go suggestion: Consider adding more comments to the code to explain what each function does. This will make the code more readable and easier to maintain. [medium] relevant line: func (c FakeVulnerabilitySummaries) List(ctx context.Context, opts v1.ListOptions) (result v1beta1.VulnerabilitySummaryList, err error) {

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option. /describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback. /ask \<QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..." To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

[github-actions[bot]]

Summary:

• License scan: success
• Credentials scan: success
• Vulnerabilities scan: success
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: failure