fix: conform to the filesystem path limit

[vladklokun]

PR Type:

Bug fix, Refactoring

---

PR Description:

This PR includes changes to conform to the filename limit of the underlying file system. It also cleans up redundant type definitions from the Vulnerability Summary storage and fixes typos in Vulnerability Summary storage source file names. The changes include refactoring the file extensions for JSON and metadata files, adding helper functions for file path creation, and updating the corresponding tests.

---

PR Main Files Walkthrough:

files:

`pkg/registry/file/storage.go`: The file extensions for JSON and metadata files have been shortened. Helper functions have been added for creating paths for payload and metadata files, and for identifying if a file is a metadata or payload file. These changes are reflected in the functions that write, get, and count files. `pkg/registry/file/storage_test.go`: The tests have been updated to reflect the changes in file extensions and the use of helper functions for file path creation in the storage.go file. `pkg/registry/file/vulnerabilitysummarystorage.go`: This is a new file that implements a storage for vulnerability summaries. It provides vulnerability summaries for scopes like namespace and cluster. The summaries are generated on the fly and not stored. `pkg/registry/file/vulnerabilitysummarystorage_test.go`: This new file contains tests for the vulnerability summary storage. The tests cover getting a single vulnerability summary and a list of vulnerability summaries.

---

User Description:

What this PR does?

This PR:

• ensures we conform to the filename limit of the underlying file system
• cleans up redundant type definitions from the Vulnerability Summary storage
• fixes typos in Vulnerability Summary storage source file names

[codiumai-pr-agent[bot]]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: Conforming to filesystem path limit and refactoring

• 📝 PR summary: This PR includes changes to conform to the filename limit of the underlying file system. It also cleans up redundant type definitions from the Vulnerability Summary storage and fixes typos in Vulnerability Summary storage source file names. The changes include refactoring the file extensions for JSON and metadata files, adding helper functions for file path creation, and updating the corresponding tests.

• 📌 Type of PR: Bug fix

• 🧪 Relevant tests added: Yes

• ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 3 The PR includes changes to multiple files and introduces new functionality. It requires a moderate amount of effort to review.

• 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

  PR Feedback

• 💡 General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and includes necessary tests. It would be beneficial to ensure that all error paths are covered in the tests. Also, consider using constants for repeated string literals to avoid potential typos and make future changes easier.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  • relevant file: pkg/registry/file/vulnerabilitysummarystorage.go suggestion: Consider handling the case where json.Marshal or json.Unmarshal fails more gracefully. Currently, the error is logged and then returned. It might be beneficial to add more context to the error message before returning it to help with debugging if an error occurs. [important] relevant line: '+ if err = json.Unmarshal(data, objPtr); err != nil {'

  • relevant file: pkg/registry/file/vulnerabilitysummarystorage_test.go suggestion: It seems like the test cases are quite large and complex. Consider breaking them down into smaller, more focused test cases. This can make the tests easier to understand and maintain. [medium] relevant line: '+ for _, tt := range tests {'

  • relevant file: pkg/registry/file/storage_test.go suggestion: It looks like the test setup code is repeated in multiple tests. Consider extracting this into a helper function to reduce code duplication. [medium] relevant line: '+ fs := afero.NewMemMapFs()'

  • relevant file: pkg/registry/file/storage_test.go suggestion: It seems like the test cases are quite large and complex. Consider breaking them down into smaller, more focused test cases. This can make the tests easier to understand and maintain. [medium] relevant line: '+ for _, tt := range tests {'

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option. /describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback. /ask \<QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..." To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

[github-actions[bot]]

Summary:

• License scan: success
• Credentials scan: success
• Vulnerabilities scan: success
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success

[github-actions[bot]]

Summary:

• License scan: success
• Credentials scan: success
• Vulnerabilities scan: failure
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success