Trigger

[Daniel-GrunbergerCA]

Type

Tests

---

Description

This PR introduces enhancements in the tests for the Vulnerability Summary Storage. The changes include:

• Addition of new test cases for the Create function in the Vulnerability Summary Storage implementation.
• Improvement in the structure of the test cases by adding blank lines for better readability.

---

PR changes walkthrough

	Relevant files
Tests	1 files vulnerabilitysummarystorage_test.go                                                  pkg/registry/file/vulnerabilitysummarystorage_test.go The changes in this file are focused on the tests for the Create function in the Vulnerability Summary Storage implementation. New test cases have been added and the structure of the test cases has been improved for better readability. +2/-0

---

User description

Sorry, we do not accept changes directly against this repository. Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for information on where and how to contribute instead.

[codiumai-pr-agent[bot]]

PR Description updated to latest commit (https://github.com/kubescape/storage/commit/31cef8e1e04fb34be6616aa0ec04f733d92a4ddf)

[codiumai-pr-agent[bot]]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: Enhancements in the tests for the Vulnerability Summary Storage

• 📝 PR summary: This PR focuses on improving the tests for the Vulnerability Summary Storage. It includes the addition of new test cases for the Create function and improvements in the structure of the test cases for better readability.

• 📌 Type of PR: Tests

• 🧪 Relevant tests added: Yes

• ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 2, because the PR mainly involves the addition of new test cases and minor structural changes for better readability. It does not involve complex logic or architectural changes.

• 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

  PR Feedback

• 💡 General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and focuses on enhancing the test coverage which is a good practice. However, it would be beneficial to include more descriptive commit messages rather than just 'blank line'. This would provide better context for the changes made.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  - **relevant file:** ``pkg/registry/file/vulnerabilitysummarystorage_test.go`` **suggestion:** Consider adding more descriptive names for your test cases. This will make it easier to understand the purpose of each test case and the specific scenario it is testing. [medium] **relevant line:** [tests := []struct {](https://github.com/kubescape/storage/pull/73/files#diff-bf79cbb3428ae4c67de5f3511c43c9666042b0074bdd305e42ffa8c456693071R24) - **relevant file:** ``pkg/registry/file/vulnerabilitysummarystorage_test.go`` **suggestion:** It would be beneficial to add comments explaining the purpose of each test case. This will make it easier for other developers to understand what each test case is designed to verify. [medium] **relevant line:** t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {

How to use

Instructions

> To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: > **/review**: Request a review of your Pull Request. > **/describe**: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. > **/improve [--extended]**: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. > **/ask \**: Ask a question about the PR. > **/update_changelog**: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. > **/add_docs**: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. > **/generate_labels**: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. > see the [tools guide](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/docs/TOOLS_GUIDE.md) for more details. >To edit any configuration parameter from the [configuration.toml](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml), add --config_path=new_value. >For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..." >To list the possible configuration parameters, add a **/config** comment.

[github-actions[bot]]

Summary:

• License scan: failure
• Credentials scan: success
• Vulnerabilities scan: success
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success