Open nirrozenbaum opened 10 months ago
/cc @ezrasilvera /cc @pdettori /cc @MikeSpreitzer /cc @clubanderson
@nirrozenbaum just to clarify, you are suggesting that imbs1
becomes transport1
in all docs/examples/ arch description ?
@nirrozenbaum just to clarify, you are suggesting that
imbs1
becomestransport1
in all docs/examples/ arch description ?
yes
another point to mention - once we add the cluster inventory abstraction, we might want to host the abstract inventory CRs in a space. this would probably be called inventory space (the inventory of KS, not of the transport specific). therefore, IMBS doesn't make much sense at this point. so potentially we can have - WDS, Transport Space, Inventory Space. and inventory space can run on the same space as WDS or transport to minimize number of spaces.
I have no strong opinion on that. Transport seems like not accurate to me, but I don't have a good suggestion :-)
@nirrozenbaum is it urgent ? Can we do a renaming PR later on ? (i.e., during phase1 but after we stabilize our docs a little ) ?
Feature Description
I suggest rename imbs to transport space. imbs is the acronym for inventory + mailbox space. in our terms, mailbox+inventory is exactly the transport abstraction. so we could just call it transport space, which makes it clearer.
Proposed Solution
rename it
Want to contribute?
Additional Context
No response