kubevirt / community

Community content
https://kubevirt.io
49 stars 103 forks source link

community, wg, arch: add wg, sig subprojects and charter for S390x and ARM #298

Open dhiller opened 4 months ago

dhiller commented 4 months ago

What this PR does / why we need it:

PR #301 added the wg-TEMPLATE as a starting point for creating working groups.

This PR adds two initial wg-arch working groups:

Also it defines subprojects in sig-buildsystem and sig-ci, so that arch wg members can own code.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged): Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

dhiller commented 3 months ago

/hold

PR https://github.com/kubevirt/community/pull/301 was split out of this one, so this needs to be rebased after that one got merged.

FYI @fabiand

chandramerla commented 3 months ago

/lgtm

kubevirt-bot commented 3 months ago

@chandramerla: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to [this](https://github.com/kubevirt/community/pull/298#issuecomment-2194081639): >/lgtm Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes-sigs/prow](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/prow/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
kubevirt-bot commented 2 months ago

@cfilleke: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to [this](https://github.com/kubevirt/community/pull/298#discussion_r1689925234): >/lgtm Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes-sigs/prow](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/prow/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.
jean-edouard commented 4 days ago

@dhiller is the hold still relevant?

dhiller commented 1 day ago

@dhiller is the hold still relevant?

Thanks for the reminder :) Yeah, I think a rebase is needed here, other than that it should be good to go. @jean-edouard will ping you again after that's done if you're ok with that?

dhiller commented 1 day ago

/unhold

@chandramerla @cfilleke @zhlhahaha I have rebased this PR, PTAL, thanks a lot!

@jean-edouard FYI

jean-edouard commented 1 day ago

/approve /cc @jschintag @cfilleke @vamsikrishna-siddu @chandramerla @zhlhahaha

kubevirt-bot commented 1 day ago

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jean-edouard

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - ~~[OWNERS](https://github.com/kubevirt/community/blob/main/OWNERS)~~ [jean-edouard] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment