Closed jcanocan closed 1 year ago
@jcanocan is #2318 enough to consider this closed or are we targeting more profiles?
@jcanocan is #2318 enough to consider this closed or are we targeting more profiles?
As far as I know, there's not plans for implementing more static profiles.
We are exploring if a dynamic profile that follows the kubelet rate limits configuration would be useful. You can find further details in: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CNV-27873. Nevertheless, we can close this issue for now since this would be a more dynamic approach and I will open a new issue in the future.
Many thanks for the remainder.
Is this a BUG REPORT or FEATURE REQUEST?:
/kind enhancement
What happened: In https://github.com/kubevirt/hyperconverged-cluster-operator/pull/2197 we have introduced a user-friendly mechanism to adjust the rate limiting
Query Per Second (QPS)
andburst
values. Now, we want to create static profiles such ashighBurst
hiding the raw configuration values.What you expected to happen: It would be more easy for users to high scale their clusters allowing them to create a high number of VMs in a bulk if we have a
highBurst
profile which hides the raw numbers:Values behind the
highBurst
profile are under discussion/testing in order to figure out possible downsides of increasing these values.Issue tracked in: CNV-14170 How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible):
Anything else we need to know?:
Environment:
oc get csv -n kubevirt-hyperconverged
): 4.14.0kubectl version
): any