drssdinblck
commented
1 year ago To be even more specific: It seems like one must specify the label on the VM and on the VMI object (inside the template section of the VM resource). When specifying the VM as follows, I was able to expose VM ports via NodePort service objects:
yaml
apiVersion: kubevirt.io/v1
kind: VirtualMachine
metadata:
labels:
kubevirt.io/os: linux
vmName: "__VM_NAME__"
name: "__VM_NAME__"
spec:
running: true
template:
metadata:
creationTimestamp: null
labels:
kubevirt.io/domain: "__VM_NAME__"
vmName: "__VM_NAME__"
spec:
domain:
cpu:
cores: __VM_CORES__
model: host-passthrough
devices:
disks:
- disk:
bus: virtio
name: disk0
- cdrom:
bus: sata
readonly: true
name: cloudinitdisk
# see https://github.com/kubevirt/user-guide/pull/262/files
rng: {}
machine:
type: q35
resources:
requests:
memory: "__VM_MEMORY__"
volumes:
- name: disk0
persistentVolumeClaim:
claimName: "__VM_NAME__"
- cloudInitNoCloud:
userData: |
#cloud-config
hostname: __VM_NAME__
ssh_pwauth: True
disable_root: false
ssh_authorized_keys:
- __VM_SSH_PUBLIC_KEY__
name: cloudinitdisk
kubevirt-bot
dhiller
chuot803
aburdenthehand
anishbista60
The service objects doc currently specify users edit the VMI object, however it seems as though this should be done on the VM (and restart if running).
This was raised on this thread: https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C8ED7RKFE/p1688475040764709
If this is the case, we should update this doc: https://github.com/kubevirt/user-guide/blame/main/docs/virtual_machines/service_objects.md