Consider protected visibility for AbstractExecutionThreadServices getServiceName method

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Use case: using a different executor (an ExecutorService, really) for an 
AbstractExecutionThreadService implementation.

This (probably) implements a Service pattern: it has startUp() and shutDown() 
but a noop run() method plus custom, service specific, methods which return 
Future instances. These are returned by executorService.submit(...) executions 
which perform work on the services (in this case) newSingleThreadExecutor.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by joern.ba...@gmail.com on 23 Sep 2010 at 10:05

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Edit: the ExecutorService would naturally utilize the ThreadFactoryBuilder and 
would want to re-use getServiceName to create a setNameFormat String. 

Original comment by joern.ba...@gmail.com on 23 Sep 2010 at 10:06

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Issue 456 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by kevinb@google.com on 17 Dec 2010 at 6:34

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by fry@google.com on 5 Apr 2011 at 8:43

• Changed state: Accepted

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by kevinb@google.com on 13 Jul 2011 at 6:18

• Changed state: Triaged

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by kevinb@google.com on 18 Jul 2011 at 3:55

• Changed state: Accepted
• Added labels: Type-Enhancement

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by cpov...@google.com on 21 Jul 2011 at 7:58

• Added labels: Milestone-Release10

[GoogleCodeExporter]

This will be fixed in the next release.

Original comment by fry@google.com on 27 Jul 2011 at 6:47

• Changed state: Fixed

[GoogleCodeExporter]

This issue has been migrated to GitHub.

It can be found at https://github.com/google/guava/issues/<id>

Original comment by cgdecker@google.com on 1 Nov 2014 at 4:15

• Added labels: MigratedToGitHub

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by cgdecker@google.com on 3 Nov 2014 at 9:09

• Added labels: Restrict-AddIssueComment-Commit