MIT and Harvard are in agreement for all office-candidate observation in terms of vote totals. There is one candidate in which they are listed with the incorrect party:
CVR results deviate slightly from precinct results (among the offices we have precinct results for) -- these deviations are in yellow range.
As with other NM issues, further precinct results need to be collected for verification. In this county, the offices precinct results are needed for are:
Recommendation: Fix MIT version for STATE HOUSE (009), but keep rest of data as is and follow up about lack of precinct results for state leg races as reported in https://github.com/kuriwaki/cvr_harvard-mit_scripts/issues/160.
MIT and Harvard are in agreement for all office-candidate observation in terms of vote totals. There is one candidate in which they are listed with the incorrect party:
DEMOCRAT
but MIT labels them asREPUBLICAN
. MIT is incorrect -- see https://electionresults.sos.nm.gov/resultsSW.aspx?type=LGX&map=CTY&eid=2782&distSelect=1.CVR results deviate slightly from precinct results (among the offices we have precinct results for) -- these deviations are in yellow range.
As with other NM issues, further precinct results need to be collected for verification. In this county, the offices precinct results are needed for are: