Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
when nulldc supports dx10, then it'd be a possibility.
right now, not so much.
Original comment by danialho...@gmail.com
on 14 Jun 2010 at 5:06
And what DirectX has to do with it? I've seen couple of older games (dx7/8)
with AA/AF adjustment bundled.
Original comment by rompecal...@gmail.com
on 14 Jun 2010 at 6:59
PC Games != Emulation.
For AA, refer to Issue 65.
For AF, just force it from your video card's control panel.
Original comment by KrossX3
on 14 Jun 2010 at 7:10
"And what DirectX has to do with it? I've seen couple of older games (dx7/8)
with AA/AF adjustment bundled."
Its an nvidia limitation due to the fact nvidia does not expose the 24bit Z
mode implemented, so an emulation mode is set aside which breaks AA
Original comment by danialho...@gmail.com
on 14 Jun 2010 at 10:08
"PC Games != Emulation."
Indeed you're right. However, there are some emulators that can do that as
well. Some old ones too :-).
Original comment by rompecal...@gmail.com
on 15 Jun 2010 at 7:19
Attachments:
LOL
i dunno about psyman and drk, but i have even less reason to want to help you
now.
Original comment by danialho...@gmail.com
on 15 Jun 2010 at 9:16
[deleted comment]
And why is that?
I don't need no help, as there are some workarounds for this issue. I just
think nullDC is the future of Dreamcast emulation and I also think that
testing, reporting bugs and requesting features is all usual people like me can
do to possibly make it better.
I wish for pj64 for Dreamcast. Or ePSXe for Dreamcast. Or anything like that.
Now or anytime in the future. Those games are worth it.
Cheers.
Original comment by rompecal...@gmail.com
on 16 Jun 2010 at 11:57
Different emulators, emulate different systems... that have different needs.
Even on the same emulator, the same would go for different plugins (Pete's OGL
vs OGL2 for example). Thus, the AA situation is what it is for drkPVR.
Regardless if you like it, or not. If you have further comments about AA
support, please use Issue 65.
And since AF can be forced by ATI/nVIDIA without any problem, there's no real
need for a setting. Therefore, this could be merged to Issue 65 or be left as
"won't fix". What do you prefer?
Original comment by KrossX3
on 16 Jun 2010 at 8:54
This supposed to an 'Enhancement' request to begin with, but I didn't know how
to set it up via the form here.
Leave it as it is, 'close' it if there's such and option (and you wish to), or
simply give it a very low priority. I'd prefer not to merge this with any
related thread, as it supposed to a different thing - a suggestion for an
enhancement, not a bug report. It doesn't really mater, as your point seems
clear.
Original comment by rompecal...@gmail.com
on 16 Jun 2010 at 9:45
Roger.
Original comment by KrossX3
on 16 Jun 2010 at 10:35
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
rompecal...@gmail.com
on 14 Jun 2010 at 1:10