Bug: incorrect squawks generation for SACF

kusterjs / CCAMS-server

Server backend to manage squawk assignment schemes/ranges and all currently assigned/used codes to answer requests from plugins for a code

https://ccams.kilojuliett.ch

GNU General Public License v3.0

0 stars 0 forks source link

Closed javoescan closed 3 years ago

javoescan commented 3 years ago

Description: Incorrect squawks generation for SACF

Position: SACO_APP

Actual behavior

Expected behavior

Version: 1.7.0

Extra information The SSRs that its generating right now are from SARR, maybe there was a confusion while setting the ranges?

kusterjs commented 3 years ago

Please provide the date when this behaviour was observed.

javoescan commented 3 years ago

All "incorect squawks generations" bugs were tested yesterdar 6/5/2021 at 3PM UTC

kusterjs commented 3 years ago

Referring to https://ccams.kilojuliett.ch/ and kusterjs/CCAMS-server#26, can you verify than once again the SSR code ranges for each FIR designator?

javoescan commented 3 years ago

@kusterjs I can confirm that on https://ccams.kilojuliett.ch/ the three FIRs (SARR, SAMF and SACF) have their ranges wrong and they don't match with the image posted on https://github.com/kusterjs/CCAMS-server/issues/26.

javoescan commented 3 years ago

I can write them down separately if that works for you

kusterjs commented 3 years ago

I just need to know which names from the graphic belong to which designators.

javoescan commented 3 years ago

FIR Ezeiza -> SAEF FIR Comodoro -> SAVC FIR Cordoba -> SACF FIR Resistencia -> SARR FIR Mendoza -> SAMF

kusterjs commented 3 years ago

Comodoro is SAVC or SAVF?

javoescan commented 3 years ago

Sorry, SAVF

kusterjs commented 3 years ago

FIR ranges changed as requested