More pemissive license?

kvark / copyless

[deprecated] Avoid memcpy calls when working with standard containers

Apache License 2.0

276 stars 12 forks source link

More pemissive license? #16

Closed stanislav-tkach closed 4 years ago

stanislav-tkach commented 4 years ago

I'm not sure if it is appropriate, but can you please replace the license by a more permissive one? For example, MIT or Apache 2.0. I would like to use this library, but the company that I'm currently working at has a policy that forbids MPL license.

kvark commented 4 years ago

I'm totally open to switch to MIT+Apache, we have that in other projects too. Let's ask the contributors for permission:

[x] @kvark
[x] @danielhenrymantilla
[x] @marcotoniut
[x] @eun-ice
[x] @erjanmx
[x] @badboy

If we don't get an answer in a week from now, we'll consider rewriting the relevant parts.

badboy commented 4 years ago

I merely fixed some typos. But if required I hereby allow a a relicense to MIT/Apache

eun-ice commented 4 years ago

I contributed just a few lines to fix a bug.

But I feel honored by being asked and of course I happily allow a relicense to MIT/Apache.

danielhenrymantilla commented 4 years ago

Fine for me :+1:

kvark commented 4 years ago

Alright, we are all set. Thanks everyone for responding! @DarkEld3r would you be interested in making a PR that switches us to dual-license?