Closed gpoo closed 8 years ago
Seeing as the math and protocol are public and published in Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies an De Gruyter Open Access Journal
And all of that is licensed: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
I would think some some FOSS license is appropriate, see: http://choosealicense.com/licenses/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_free_and_open-source_software_licenses https://opensource.org/licenses
Mozilla Public License 2.0 is likely closest to the way you did the paper: http://choosealicense.com/licenses/mpl-2.0/
Permissions
Conditions
Limitations
Thanks for the suggestions. I'll take a deeper look and add a license soon.
On Jul 21, 2016 17:48, "Ben" notifications@github.com wrote:
Seeing as the math and protocol are public and published in Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies an De Gruyter Open Access Journal
And all of that is licensed: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
I would think some some FOSS license is appropriate, see: http://choosealicense.com/licenses/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_free_and_open-source_software_licenses https://opensource.org/licenses
Mozilla Public License 2.0 is likely closest to the way you did the paper: http://choosealicense.com/licenses/mpl-2.0/
Permissions
- Commercial Use
- Distribution
- Modification
- Patent Use
- Private Use
Conditions
- Disclose Source
- License and Copyright Notice
- Same License
Limitations
- Hold Liable
- Trademark Use
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/kwonalbert/riffle/issues/1#issuecomment-234313553, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB2KIiLaZGwALNzOb7a5J8Z41xO6vBnTks5qX6LCgaJpZM4JRfGF .
The lack of license means All rights reserved and it may affect the adoption (for example, porting the ode to other languages or distributing the code).