kxylxp / grub4dos-chenall

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/grub4dos-chenall
0 stars 0 forks source link

NTFS directory reads are twice as slow as FAT32 or exFAT #189

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?

if make a batch file that does 1000 loops of:

if exist /fred.txt echo fred > (md)0x300+1

On an NTFS formatted USB 2.0 flash drive it takes 40 seconds.
The same drive formatted as FAT32 takes 20 seconds.
The same drive formatted as exFAT takes 24 seconds.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

If enumerating files in large directories, why is NTFS so slow?
Can it be speeded up?

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
0.4.5c and 0.4.6a give similar results

Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Steve6375 on 28 Jul 2014 at 12:00

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
May be NTFS format is more complex, it takes more time to calculate.

I do not understand NTFS。

Original comment by chenall.cn on 3 Aug 2014 at 12:07