Closed rdcavanha closed 3 years ago
Probably not. To hard to maintain TBH. Just don't have the time to maintain an armada of branches and tags.
I'd rather remove features and improve testing so it's unlikely things go wrong.
It's the removing of tags that's getting me. For example, 2.5 did exist, but now it doesn't. Using latest can lead to breakages when the configuration file requires changes. Understandable about the time to maintain, though. Otherwise, thanks for providing all of this. Docker Hub says 1 billion + downloads.
It's the removing of tags that's getting me. For example, 2.5 did exist, but now it doesn't. Using latest can lead to breakages when the configuration file requires changes. Understandable about the time to maintain, though. Otherwise, thanks for providing all of this. Docker Hub says 1 billion + downloads.
I did NOT believe you so I was about to Google it just say that you were wrong and it MUST be 1 Million+ but holy shit
This guy's a legend.
Could you please consider using tags instead of
latest
? It makes nearly impossible to rollback to a previous version in case something goes wrong when usinglatest
.P.S.: I see, for instance, that
latest
and2.4
were pushed around the same time, but their digest don't match.