Closed LanaCoyote closed 9 years ago
Ah, good idea. What do you think about automatically adding in @-names if and only if no @-names are mentioned in the status? That way if you just want to reply to one or two people in a thread, you can list them explicitly.
Maybe only if there's no @-names at the start of a post, rather than in the entire body? Otherwise it sounds good.
hmm, to avoid false positives where someone unrelated to the conversation is mentioned in the reply? Maybe in that case, we should say, auto-prepend the @-names unless one or more of them is already mentioned in the status.
That makes the most sense. I'll work on it later tonight
Ok, I made it so it checks to see if any of the participating users are already mentioned in the status.
Looking forward to trying this out, Thanks! (and your way of excluding the current user is much better than the quick-and-dirty BLACKLIST thing I was doing, so thank you for fixing that too)
I don't now what was going on with the merge conflicts, but I fixed them on the command line.
Most likely related to my repo being out of date. I'll have to fast forward it before I do anything else
This PR automatically replies to all mentioned users in a status rather than just the author of the status. This allows a user to reply to Twitter conversations without having to manually include mentioned users.