Closed snarfed closed 9 years ago
Thanks for the heads up! (Sheesh, it would have been broken for months and I had no idea)
Fixed in https://github.com/kylewm/redwind/commit/104a73a23779e4b6076083dd6fd75396ac3e39eb
thanks!
just fyi, looks like this regressed. e.g. here's the top item in your atom feed right now. note the relative /imageproxy
url. low priority, obviously!
<content type="html" xml:base="https://kylewm.com" xml:space="preserve">
<p>What does it mean when Firefox does this? Seems to have a particular issue with <a class="auto-link" href="http://Brid.gy">Brid.gy</a> right now</p>
<a href="https://kylewm.com/2016/01/what-does-it-mean-when-firefox-does-this-seems-to/files/firefox-GET-failure.png">
<img src="/imageproxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fkylewm.com%2F2016%2F01%2Fwhat-does-it-mean-when-firefox-does-this-seems-to%2Ffiles%2Ffirefox-GET-failure.png&w=600&h=600&mode=clip&sig=cf5350912e0a47844242fe1c6a34aab4f2d2fafa" />
</a>
</content>
I accidentally posted that note without an image the first time. Is it possible PuSH beat me to fixing it? Or is this happening on all photo posts?
looks like all of the <img>
tags in your atom have relative /imageproxy
urls like in the example above.
oh! it showed up in my reader again just now with the image. maybe due to a new id. so you're probably right, i saw the original imageless post first.
i guess atom parsing and rendering is smarter about relative urls than i guessed. :P
surprisingly little info about it online, but I think xml:base
is supposed to tell it where to base relative urls from. thanks for the heads up!
low priority, obviously! :P example: