kzwkt / winetricks

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/winetricks
0 stars 0 forks source link

sha1sum mismatch while trying to install opensymbol font #325

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. using r1004 from wine-team ppa (ubuntu saucy)
2. want to install opensymbol font as wine is unable to find the one installed 
with saucy
3. but get repeatdly the same error posted below, even if i rename the deb file 
or even purge then reinstall winetricks or delete the .cache then logout/in 
again

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?

Please provide any additional information below.
sha1sum mismatch! Rename 
/home/oem/.cache/winetricks/opensymbol/ttf-opensymbol_3.2.1-11+squeeze4_all.deb 
and try again.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by sparb...@numericable.fr on 28 Jun 2013 at 6:08

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Strangely i've been able to install that , but i've called /usr/bin/winetricks 
and now into .cache there is an *squeeze8_all.deb package with an older date 
(2010).

Im sure there is no older winetricks files on that system (no other partition 
mounted, previous winetricks purged, related files erased) and the actual is 
r1004.
But:
oem@oem-desktop:/usr/bin$ winetricks --version
20120308
?????  does not return the version written inside r1004 !!!!

Original comment by sparb...@numericable.fr on 28 Jun 2013 at 6:29

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What does 'which -a winetricks' show? You likely have a second one installed 
somewhere...

This was fixed in r940, btw.

Original comment by austinenglish@gmail.com on 29 Jun 2013 at 2:40

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
hm, there was an oldish winetricks inside /usr/local/bin/; so now winetricks is 
only inside /usr/bin/, and there is no more complaint

Original comment by sparb...@numericable.fr on 5 Jul 2013 at 7:35

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Whew.  Not a bug, then.

Original comment by daniel.r...@gmail.com on 5 Jul 2013 at 2:17