Closed l3kn closed 4 years ago
In org-drill failed items are collected in a again-entries
list,
which is reviewed in random order once all other cards are done.
((<= result org-drill-failure-quality)
(if (oref session again-entries)
(setf (oref session again-entries)
(org-drill-shuffle (oref session again-entries))))
(org-drill-push-end m (oref session again-entries)))
Another difference between SM2, org-drill and org-fc is how rating "again" affects the ease factor of a card:
SM2 specification:
If the quality response was lower than 3 then start repetitions for the item from the beginning without changing the E-Factor (i.e. use intervals I(1), I(2) etc. as if the item was memorized anew).
In org-drill:
;; When an item is failed, its interval is reset to 0,
;; but its EF is unchanged
In Anki (quoting https://faqs.ankiweb.net/what-spaced-repetition-algorithm.html):
The card is placed into relearning mode, the ease is decreased by 20 percentage points (that is, 20 is subtracted from the 'ease' value, which is in units of percentage points), and the current interval is multiplied by the value of 'new interval' (this interval will be used when the card exits relearning mode).
but
Successive failures while cards are in learning do not result in further decreases to the card’s ease. A common complaint with the standard SM-2 algorithm is that repeated failings of a card cause the card to get stuck in "low interval hell". In Anki, the initial acquisition process does not influence a card’s ease.
I think a good compromise would be to
box < 2
)
The spacing algorithm in org-fc is based on SM2, with similar modifications as Anki, most notably reducing the number of ratings from 6 to 4.
It would be useful to append forgotten cards (rated "again") to the review session and repeat them until they are remembered correctly, especially when learning new items.
Quoting https://www.supermemo.com/en/archives1990-2015/english/ol/sm2:
In org-fc, each card/position has a "box" value counting how many times in a row it has been reviewed correctly. Anki treats all cards in box 0 and 1 as "learning", adding them to review sessions (that have only few cards?) even if they are not due yet.
I've only tried this with a small Anki deck, and it seems like cards rated "again" repeated in the same session until they are reviewed correctly.
Quoting the Anki docs:
Another open question is how the ease should change if a item is rated "again" multiple times in the same session.