Suppressions for checks, more unit tests

[h1alexbel]

closes #85

---

PR-Codex overview

Detailed summary

• Added a new class VeryLongClassName in two different locations with different annotations.
• Added a new configuration in pom.xml.
• Renamed the method parsesClassNamesInRightFormat to parsesInvalidClassNamesInRightFormat in ClassNamesTest.
• Modified the imports in IsSuppressedTest.
• Added two new test methods in LongClassNameCheckTest and MethodChangesStateTest.
• Added a new interface CodeClass and implemented it in CodeClass.java.
• Added a new interface Code and implemented it in Code.java.
• Added a new class Declaration and implemented CodeClass in Declaration.java.
• Added a new class Default and implemented Code in Default.java.
• Added a new interface Code and implemented it in Code.java.
• Added a new class Default and implemented Code in Default.java.

The following files were skipped due to too many changes: src/main/java/ru/l3r8y/parser/Default.java, src/main/java/ru/l3r8y/parser/ClassNames.java, src/main/java/ru/l3r8y/parser/IgnoresSuppressed.java, src/test/java/ru/l3r8y/extensions/SuppressedLongClassName.java, src/test/java/ru/l3r8y/parser/DeclarationTest.java, src/test/java/ru/l3r8y/extensions/ParserDeclaration.java, src/test/java/ru/l3r8y/extensions/ManySuppressionsDeclaration.java, src/test/java/ru/l3r8y/parser/DefaultTest.java, src/test/java/ru/l3r8y/parser/SuppressedChecksTest.java, src/test/java/ru/l3r8y/parser/IgnoresSuppressedTest.java

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

[zoeself]

@h1alexbel thank you for your Pull Request. I'll assign someone to review it soon.

If this PR solves a todo from the code, please don't forget to remove it.

[zoeself]

@l3r8yJ please review this Pull Request. Deadline (when it should be merged or closed) is 2024-01-08T12:10:03.968245.

You should check if the requirements have been implemented (partially or in full), if there are unit tests covering the changes and if the CI build passes. Feel free to reject the PR or ask for changes if it's too big or not clear enough.

Estimation here is 30 minutes, that's how much you will be paid. You will be paid even if this PR gets rejected.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (c662b88) 76.99% compared to head (59261bc) 78.24%. Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

:exclamation: Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #125 +/- ## ============================================ + Coverage 76.99% 78.24% +1.25% - Complexity 70 79 +9 ============================================ Files 18 21 +3 Lines 226 239 +13 Branches 8 10 +2 ============================================ + Hits 174 187 +13 Misses 46 46 Partials 6 6 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sonarcloud[bot]]

Quality Gate passed

The SonarCloud Quality Gate passed, but some issues were introduced.

5 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[h1alexbel]

@l3r8yJ take a look, please

[l3r8yJ]

@rultor merge

[rultor]

@rultor merge

@l3r8yj OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

[rultor]

@rultor merge

@l3r8yj Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 2min)

[zoeself]

@l3r8yJ thank you for resolving this ticket. I've just added it to your active invoice. You can always check all your invoices and more on the Contributor Dashboard.