Closed amm0nite closed 7 months ago
Totals | |
---|---|
Change from base Build 8815431142: | 0.2% |
Covered Lines: | 982 |
Relevant Lines: | 1367 |
Hi @amm0nite,
Thanks for the PR. looks fantastic! I will wait for @rg0now 's response before merging it. If it is not a secret, mind to tell us a few words about your use-case?
Thanks a lot, this is really useful. If you have similar PRs, don't hold them back...:-)
Thanks for checking and merging my pull request! We use Stunner to help with WebRTC video streaming. With this metric I can keep an eye on usage stats and spot if there's a sudden dip in service utilization. This could help me figure out quickly if users are having trouble accessing the service.
Hello!
I'm currently monitoring a TURN server using Stunner (Headless deployment model) and have come across an issue with the stunner_listener_connections metric. This metric is described in the documentation as representing the "Number of active downstream connections at a listener." However, in my setup, it consistently reports a value of 16, which coincidentally matches the --udp-thread-num setting, regardless of the service's actual usage.
I found an answer in the discord that explains that it is expected behavior when using UDP for Stunner as I do. And then there is an interesting message:
I looked at the code and found that it was almost already implemented. I made the changes to make it work and validated in my test environment. As suggested in the discord message, i want to submit this to voice the need for the metric!