search

lab-cosmo / i-pi-dev_archive

Development version of i-PI
21 stars 12 forks source link

Removal of i-pi/i-pi github project #161

Closed zerothi closed 7 years ago

zerothi commented 7 years ago

Currently when you search for i-pi on github you are most likely to find this:

https://github.com/i-pi/i-pi/graphs/contributors

Do you have any sentiment for keeping the i-pi/i-pi project open? It seems clear that this project site is the main development of i-pi.

Kind regards

ceriottm commented 7 years ago

It's a good question -- the idea is that in 2017 we will release a 2.0 version that will go on i-pi/i-pi. For the moment i-PI is a very young code and so it did make sense to have a fork in which there were no guarantees of stability, but I expect things will gradually change and so yes, ideally i-pi/i-pi should be the place where the code will go once stable. Also to mark the fact that is not just a EPFL/COSMO project, but has contributions from many different places and people.

On 26 January 2017 at 07:49, Nick R. Papior notifications@github.com wrote:

Currently when you search for i-pi on github you are most likely to find this:

https://github.com/i-pi/i-pi/graphs/contributors

Do you have any sentiment for keeping the i-pi/i-pi project open? It seems clear that this project site is the main development of i-pi.

Kind regards

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/epfl-cosmo/i-pi-dev/issues/161, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABESZxDBqb-bzOUc2CBE3yR-HlrLL1lVks5rWEHngaJpZM4LuV7Y .

zerothi commented 7 years ago

Ok.

PS. I think the transition should happen before it becomes popular to use the epfl site. Already now there are many more forks and contributions to the epfl site.

(Sorry for pushing ;), just my 2 cents)

Thanks!

On 26 Jan 2017 2:47 pm, "Michele Ceriotti" notifications@github.com wrote:

It's a good question -- the idea is that in 2017 we will release a 2.0 version that will go on i-pi/i-pi. For the moment i-PI is a very young code and so it did make sense to have a fork in which there were no guarantees of stability, but I expect things will gradually change and so yes, ideally i-pi/i-pi should be the place where the code will go once stable. Also to mark the fact that is not just a EPFL/COSMO project, but has contributions from many different places and people.

On 26 January 2017 at 07:49, Nick R. Papior notifications@github.com wrote:

Currently when you search for i-pi on github you are most likely to find this:

https://github.com/i-pi/i-pi/graphs/contributors

Do you have any sentiment for keeping the i-pi/i-pi project open? It seems clear that this project site is the main development of i-pi.

Kind regards

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/epfl-cosmo/i-pi-dev/issues/161, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe- auth/ABESZxDBqb-bzOUc2CBE3yR-HlrLL1lVks5rWEHngaJpZM4LuV7Y .

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/epfl-cosmo/i-pi-dev/issues/161#issuecomment-275391718, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEkWIXF17lfGl6tumLuv9DaI8tWoI6jOks5rWKQFgaJpZM4LuV7Y .