larsvilhuber
commented
5 years ago It's an issue with the double-entry ("re-enter email"). Validation of the original email is fine. Re-entering is not.
-- Lars Vilhuber, Economist Cornell University, Executive Director, Labor Dynamics Institute and ILR School - Department of Economics American Economic Association - Data Editor Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality - Managing Editor
e: lars.vilhuber@cornell.edu p: +1.607-330-5743 v: https://cornell.zoom.us/my/larsvilhuber w: http://lars.vilhuber.com/ http://lars.vilhuber.com/
Assistant: ldi@cornell.edu | +1.607-255-2744
From: Brandon Elam Barker notifications@github.com Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 22:35 To: labordynamicsinstitute/metajelo-ui Cc: Lars Vilhuber; Author Subject: Re: [labordynamicsinstitute/metajelo-ui] No need to validate email addresses (#5)
If this is an issue with the constant validation feedback I can remove it, but we get it for free, as the package is using the RFC 5322 spec.
The validation also occurs in metajelo-web, which would display an error for instance, if an invalid e-mail address was specified in an xml document.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/labordynamicsinstitute/metajelo-ui/issues/5?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABVSQ6CRAXFV2VOHDUT5ZFTP7E5OTA5CNFSM4ICVA3KKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODZ3HRCA#issuecomment-511080584, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABVSQ6COZWW4Z2JWUIDOXM3P7E5OTANCNFSM4ICVA3KA.
bbarker
If this is an issue with the constant validation feedback I can remove it, but we get it for free, as the package is using the RFC 5322 spec.
The validation also occurs in metajelo-web, which would display an error for instance, if an invalid e-mail address was specified in an xml document.