search

labordynamicsinstitute / qwi_schemas

Unofficial LEHD Schema files
https://lehd.ces.census.gov/data/schema/
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
1 stars 6 forks source link

Edits to 6.19.2 #146

Open srt1 opened 5 years ago

srt1 commented 5 years ago

The second row below should read pseof, not pseoe.

1. there is a typo - the first row reads pseoe, but the second should read pseof

Variable Description
pseoe Flag: aggregation level available on PSEO Earnings
pseoe Flag: aggregation level available on PSEO Flows

2. We missed some stuff on the bullets below. Please correct with the following.

The characteristics available on an aggregation level are repeated using a series of flags following the standard schema:

jodyhoonstarr commented 5 years ago

I'm gonna let this sit until tomorrow so we can group any other typos into one update. Please tack any issues in 4.5.0-draft to this ticket.

jodyhoonstarr commented 5 years ago

The items above are fixed. Please review: https://labordynamicsinstitute.github.io/qwi_schemas/formats/V4.5.0-draft/lehd_public_use_schema.html

srt1 commented 5 years ago

I'm sorry, this seems to have fallen through the cracks. Jody fixed the first issue, but not the second.

Jody, can you update 4.5.0-draft to read the following (within 6.19.2)? You should see where it is on the page - it is missing the cip_level. Also, like the others, cip_level should have hyperlink to 6.15.1.

This is a correction to an existing schema, no new version number required. Thanks.

The characteristics available on an aggregation level are repeated using a series of flags following the standard schema:

    cip_level - degree field reporting level of table
    inst_level - institution reporting level of table
    geo_level - geographic reporting level of table
    ind_level - industry reporting level of table
    by_ variables - flags indicating other dimensions reported, including graduation cohort and degree level
larsvilhuber commented 5 years ago

That means formally it becomes 4.5.0.1-draft. but is still referenced externally as 4.5.0-draft.

Lars

-- Lars Vilhuber, Economist Cornell University, Executive Director, Labor Dynamics Institute and ILR School - Department of Economics American Economic Association - Data Editor Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality - Managing Editor

e: lars.vilhuber@cornell.edu p: +1.607-330-5743 v: https://cornell.zoom.us/my/larsvilhuber w: http://lars.vilhuber.com/ http://lars.vilhuber.com/

Assistant: ldi@cornell.edu | +1.607-255-2744

From: Stephen Tibbets notifications@github.com Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 10:58 To: labordynamicsinstitute/qwi_schemas qwi_schemas@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [labordynamicsinstitute/qwi_schemas] Edits to 6.19.2 (#146)

I'm sorry, this seems to have fallen through the cracks. Jody fixed the first issue, but not the second.

Jody, can you update 4.5.0-draft to read the following (within 6.19.2)? You should see where it is on the page - it is missing the cip_level. Also, like the others, cip_level should have hyperlink to 6.15.1.

This is a correction to an existing schema, no new version number required. Thanks.

The characteristics available on an aggregation level are repeated using a series of flags following the standard schema:

cip_level - degree field reporting level of table
inst_level - institution reporting level of table
geo_level - geographic reporting level of table
ind_level - industry reporting level of table
by_ variables - flags indicating other dimensions reported, including graduation cohort and degree level

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/labordynamicsinstitute/qwi_schemas/issues/146?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABVSQ6GZICD55RQVYAZHRHTQKOHTHA5CNFSM4IET5NL2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD7DYY6A#issuecomment-533171320, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABVSQ6CQ7DLWUBV5QCYXACDQKOHTHANCNFSM4IET5NLQ.

srt1 commented 5 years ago

Thanks for the clarification, Lars - I wasn't aware of the internal fourth digit on the version.

Jody - I just realized, it looks like the CIP_LEVEL variable was described in 16.9.1 (J2J), not 16.9.2 (PSEO). It's like that on the version currently published on our website. Can you move just the CIP_LEVEL variable to 16.9.2? Also, the INST_LEVEL variable does not belong in 16.9.1 - it looks like it was added to both.

Apologies for not reviewing this earlier - one of the things that was dropped (by me) on the runup to the release.

From: Lars Vilhuber notifications@github.com Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 4:01 PM To: labordynamicsinstitute/qwi_schemas qwi_schemas@noreply.github.com Cc: Stephen R Tibbets (CENSUS/CES FED) Stephen.R.Tibbets@census.gov; Assign assign@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [labordynamicsinstitute/qwi_schemas] Edits to 6.19.2 (#146)

That means formally it becomes 4.5.0.1-draft. but is still referenced externally as 4.5.0-draft.

Lars

-- Lars Vilhuber, Economist Cornell University, Executive Director, Labor Dynamics Institute and ILR School - Department of Economics American Economic Association - Data Editor Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality - Managing Editor

e: lars.vilhuber@cornell.edu p: +1.607-330-5743 v: https://cornell.zoom.us/my/larsvilhuber w: http://lars.vilhuber.com/ http://lars.vilhuber.com/

Assistant: ldi@cornell.edu | +1.607-255-2744

From: Stephen Tibbets notifications@github.com Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 10:58 To: labordynamicsinstitute/qwi_schemas qwi_schemas@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [labordynamicsinstitute/qwi_schemas] Edits to 6.19.2 (#146)

I'm sorry, this seems to have fallen through the cracks. Jody fixed the first issue, but not the second.

Jody, can you update 4.5.0-draft to read the following (within 6.19.2)? You should see where it is on the page - it is missing the cip_level. Also, like the others, cip_level should have hyperlink to 6.15.1.

This is a correction to an existing schema, no new version number required. Thanks.

The characteristics available on an aggregation level are repeated using a series of flags following the standard schema:

cip_level - degree field reporting level of table inst_level - institution reporting level of table geo_level - geographic reporting level of table indlevel - industry reporting level of table by variables - flags indicating other dimensions reported, including graduation cohort and degree level

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/labordynamicsinstitute/qwi_schemas/issues/146?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABVSQ6GZICD55RQVYAZHRHTQKOHTHA5CNFSM4IET5NL2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD7DYY6A#issuecomment-533171320, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABVSQ6CQ7DLWUBV5QCYXACDQKOHTHANCNFSM4IET5NLQ.

— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/labordynamicsinstitute/qwi_schemas/issues/146?email_source=notifications&email_token=AFMXFIL57LOLLQMJUDX4JB3QKPLCTA5CNFSM4IET5NL2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD7EVC3A#issuecomment-533287276, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFMXFIPHBEOYAIQSEBOD4FTQKPLCTANCNFSM4IET5NLQ.

larsvilhuber commented 5 years ago

https://lehd.ces.census.gov/data/schema/VERSIONING.html

-- Lars Vilhuber, Economist Cornell University, Executive Director, Labor Dynamics Institute and ILR School - Department of Economics American Economic Association - Data Editor Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality - Managing Editor

e: lars.vilhuber@cornell.edu p: +1.607-330-5743 v: https://cornell.zoom.us/my/larsvilhuber w: http://lars.vilhuber.com/ http://lars.vilhuber.com/

Assistant: ldi@cornell.edu | +1.607-255-2744

From: Stephen Tibbets notifications@github.com Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 16:40 To: labordynamicsinstitute/qwi_schemas qwi_schemas@noreply.github.com Cc: Lars Vilhuber lars.vilhuber@cornell.edu; Comment comment@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [labordynamicsinstitute/qwi_schemas] Edits to 6.19.2 (#146)

Thanks for the clarification, Lars - I wasn't aware of the internal fourth digit on the version.

Jody - I just realized, it looks like the CIP_LEVEL variable was described in 16.9.1 (J2J), not 16.9.2 (PSEO). It's like that on the version currently published on our website. Can you move just the CIP_LEVEL variable to 16.9.2? Also, the INST_LEVEL variable does not belong in 16.9.1 - it looks like it was added to both.

Apologies for not reviewing this earlier - one of the things that was dropped (by me) on the runup to the release.

From: Lars Vilhuber notifications@github.com Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 4:01 PM To: labordynamicsinstitute/qwi_schemas qwi_schemas@noreply.github.com Cc: Stephen R Tibbets (CENSUS/CES FED) Stephen.R.Tibbets@census.gov; Assign assign@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [labordynamicsinstitute/qwi_schemas] Edits to 6.19.2 (#146)

That means formally it becomes 4.5.0.1-draft. but is still referenced externally as 4.5.0-draft.

Lars

-- Lars Vilhuber, Economist Cornell University, Executive Director, Labor Dynamics Institute and ILR School - Department of Economics American Economic Association - Data Editor Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality - Managing Editor

e: lars.vilhuber@cornell.edu p: +1.607-330-5743 v: https://cornell.zoom.us/my/larsvilhuber w: http://lars.vilhuber.com/ http://lars.vilhuber.com/

Assistant: ldi@cornell.edu | +1.607-255-2744

From: Stephen Tibbets notifications@github.com Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 10:58 To: labordynamicsinstitute/qwi_schemas qwi_schemas@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [labordynamicsinstitute/qwi_schemas] Edits to 6.19.2 (#146)

I'm sorry, this seems to have fallen through the cracks. Jody fixed the first issue, but not the second.

Jody, can you update 4.5.0-draft to read the following (within 6.19.2)? You should see where it is on the page - it is missing the cip_level. Also, like the others, cip_level should have hyperlink to 6.15.1.

This is a correction to an existing schema, no new version number required. Thanks.

The characteristics available on an aggregation level are repeated using a series of flags following the standard schema:

cip_level - degree field reporting level of table inst_level - institution reporting level of table geo_level - geographic reporting level of table indlevel - industry reporting level of table by variables - flags indicating other dimensions reported, including graduation cohort and degree level

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/labordynamicsinstitute/qwi_schemas/issues/146?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABVSQ6GZICD55RQVYAZHRHTQKOHTHA5CNFSM4IET5NL2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD7DYY6A#issuecomment-533171320, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABVSQ6CQ7DLWUBV5QCYXACDQKOHTHANCNFSM4IET5NLQ.

— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/labordynamicsinstitute/qwi_schemas/issues/146?email_source=notifications&email_token=AFMXFIL57LOLLQMJUDX4JB3QKPLCTA5CNFSM4IET5NL2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD7EVC3A#issuecomment-533287276, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFMXFIPHBEOYAIQSEBOD4FTQKPLCTANCNFSM4IET5NLQ.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/labordynamicsinstitute/qwi_schemas/issues/146?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABVSQ6C3SNVQBCTTZAXXIX3QKPPSLA5CNFSM4IET5NL2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD7EYJFQ#issuecomment-533300374, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABVSQ6AQHCXVYX2VAHRVJRDQKPPSLANCNFSM4IET5NLQ.