Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Hi Pablo,
Thanks for the suggestion.
Actually we do plan to release a demo with MVC pattern, but our first priority
is to cleanup the code and resolve any issues with the simple example for next
couple of weeks. So it may be 2-3 weeks before we are able to release that.
If you are interested in building the MVC example, that would be a great help
too. We can help you with any problems when you build the example and would
love to feature you as a contributor.
Warm regards,
Abhinav
Original comment by tsg.bric...@gmail.com
on 6 Jun 2011 at 2:00
Custom HttpHandler not firing, returning 404 in ASP.NET MVC Application.
Original comment by ramakris...@gmail.com
on 10 Aug 2011 at 7:26
Attachments:
ASP.NET MVC is attempting to route request which is blocking the HttpHandler
from firing. To get past the (404 error), add
routes.IgnoreRoute("socialauth/{resource}.sauth/{*pathInfo}"); to Global.cs or
where ever routes are registered.
I'm running into an issue where after a user signs in the subsequent requests
aren't shown as authenticated.
Original comment by jap...@japerr.com
on 30 Sep 2011 at 3:36
"Vote Up" for MVC demo/pattern!
It would be very useful with some pointers or options for how to add
authorization, ideally using same/similar to out of box [Authorize] attribute
etc.
Thanks!
Kristian
Original comment by willsha...@gmail.com
on 6 Oct 2011 at 11:51
Hi Kristian,
Thanks for voting up. It seems MVC compatibility is something we really need to
put more focus on. Please contribute by providing more details on how do you
feel MVC and SocialAuth.NET should work together? For example, please elaborate
your thouts on using Authorize attribute in context of SocialAuth.NET
regards,
Deepak
Original comment by daggar...@brickred.com
on 7 Oct 2011 at 9:36
It would be ideal with:
* an MVC 3 login sample, which has one page requiring [Authorize], forcing
Register + Login
* Registering = adding a new user from the authentication, without using the
(restrictive) out of box Membership framework (i.e. using a custom data store,
but it's really only the 'API' that's important, having (extensible)
CreateUser() etc methods. While you can write a custom Membership provider, you
can't easily extend the 'API'.
* Having (in the samples) only SSO users and having both SSO and local users
are equally useful
HIH!
Original comment by willsha...@gmail.com
on 7 Oct 2011 at 11:00
Any update on MVC3 demo / support? Think this would be a critical feature...
Original comment by mmezza...@gmail.com
on 1 Nov 2011 at 7:55
+1 on MVC pattern with Authorize attribute integration.
Original comment by dmar...@gmail.com
on 9 Nov 2011 at 2:26
Original comment by daggar...@brickred.com
on 14 Nov 2011 at 7:33
work on this started!
Original comment by daggar...@brickred.com
on 5 Dec 2011 at 6:37
Good to hear that!
May want to take a look at this project implementation which allows
light-weight listing/managing of users, roles and account information via
ASP.NET Membership on MVC3 / Razor.
ASP.NET Membership Starter Kit
https://github.com/TroyGoode/MembershipStarterKit
Original comment by mmezza...@gmail.com
on 17 Dec 2011 at 9:06
We are closing this issue as latest release is compatible with MVC. However,
surely we expect many suggestions for which I request to raise separate issues.
regards,
Deepak
Original comment by tsg.bric...@gmail.com
on 20 Jan 2012 at 11:16
Perfect!
Original comment by pablo.gi...@gmail.com
on 20 Jan 2012 at 11:20
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
pablo.gi...@gmail.com
on 6 Jun 2011 at 1:14