Closed shu-toz closed 5 years ago
Maybe the time step in paraview is not the latest. Please check it
I have ran your Atrium test file. It showed the similar result in Rhino and ParaView
And you didn't use any other settings than just opening the .foam file???
Yeah, I just set a slice at Z=1m,and set the custom range 0-7m/s.
When I tried to press rescale, nothing happens. The model still shows the smallest value (blue)
Would you be able to send me your .foam file? If I can visualise with your .foam file it might mean there's something wrong with my butterfly install
The .foam file actually is an empty file. Here is the .foam file. You can test it. Atrium_Test.zip
Is the zip file your whole analysis?? That's what I meant sorry
The whole folder is 2.4GB size. I can not upload it to GitHub.Please give me your email. I will send you a share link.
It's sz@kirk.studio
The whole folder is 2.4GB size. I can not upload it to GitHub.Please give me your email. I will send you a share link.
I tried to open the results, I could only see these, no U values...
Ah turns out I was taking my slice source from the wrong source. I had the "InternalMesh" unticked. This was the correct source of information for the analysis.
I can confirm everything is working as it should.
Hi all,
I seem to be getting some really large values in the U-Magnitude. Even after checking and ensuring there are no points within the butterfly boundary elements.
The results seem to be shown in grasshopper with no problems however, upon closer inspection and auto scaling in paraview, they seem to be extremely high.
any insights would be great
Thanks
Atrium Test GH.zip