Closed boris-p closed 5 years ago
Hi @boris-p! Thank you for summarizing the issues.
@boris-p , Both ideas are great. You are making the early visions of Hydra a reality. If you would like to make the "combine envelopes" component a part of the suite, feel free to send a pull request that places it either in WIP or (since this seems like a smaller utility component), the Extra Tab with AdditionalHelpFromDocStrings = "0". -Chris
@mostaphaRoudsari, and @chriswmackey . I created a pull request (201. before that I created another pull request with not up to date code, sorry) If you could briefly take a look at the component and tell me if you think it fits the standard that would be great. Regarding the first issue, it might take a bit longer as it involves some changes in the actual solar envelope component and I wanted to make more extensive tests.
@boris-p thanks. I merged the PR. Looking forward to the next one.
I'm assuming I can remove @boris-p 's assignment as this issue is 4 years old.
@chriswmackey, @boris-p do we still need such feature? If I'm not mistaken a couple of people have developed workflows which does this - I have see a number of papers.
i'm pretty sure that it's already irrelevant. Just checked and the functionality was added in pr 201
Also, I think the first issue was partly addressed by @AntonelloDN 's component that allows you to get a set of sun vectors filtered based on angle above the horizon. I know it's a little different than exactly what you were describing here @boris-p but it has a similar impact of not making the envelope overly-restrictive. I agree that this issue should just be closed.
Hello everybody, recently a user posted in the LB + HB forum regarding the new solar envelope component - http://www.grasshopper3d.com/group/ladybug/forum/topic/show?id=2985220%3ATopic%3A1404397&xg_source=msg
To try and sum up my conclusions from that , I think there are two main points -
In any case i'll update the user as well and see if he has further suggestions or thoughts.
/b