Use an enum to represent layout name

[fmoletta]

Uses an enum instead of a String to represent cairo layouts. This makes layout matching faster and improves parsing of cli arguments String representation is still left in PublicInput struct, this can be changed once #1716 is merged

[github-actions[bot]]

Benchmark Results for unmodified programs :rocket:

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_factorial	1.913 ± 0.021	1.888	1.965	1.00
head big_factorial	1.927 ± 0.058	1.892	2.089	1.01 ± 0.03

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_fibonacci	1.849 ± 0.018	1.829	1.882	1.00
head big_fibonacci	1.859 ± 0.020	1.840	1.909	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base blake2s_integration_benchmark	6.564 ± 0.053	6.454	6.626	1.00
head blake2s_integration_benchmark	6.618 ± 0.100	6.470	6.808	1.01 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base compare_arrays_200000	1.921 ± 0.017	1.907	1.962	1.00 ± 0.01
head compare_arrays_200000	1.915 ± 0.022	1.897	1.964	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base dict_integration_benchmark	1.314 ± 0.017	1.298	1.356	1.00 ± 0.02
head dict_integration_benchmark	1.308 ± 0.021	1.287	1.347	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.175 ± 0.039	1.154	1.284	1.01 ± 0.04
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.168 ± 0.017	1.155	1.214	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base integration_builtins	6.549 ± 0.183	6.433	7.044	1.00 ± 0.03
head integration_builtins	6.527 ± 0.076	6.442	6.633	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base keccak_integration_benchmark	6.785 ± 0.128	6.662	7.056	1.01 ± 0.02
head keccak_integration_benchmark	6.700 ± 0.072	6.621	6.804	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base linear_search	1.929 ± 0.014	1.912	1.965	1.00
head linear_search	1.943 ± 0.059	1.908	2.088	1.01 ± 0.03

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.673 ± 0.010	1.661	1.699	1.00
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.674 ± 0.008	1.660	1.687	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_integration_benchmark	1.472 ± 0.037	1.444	1.543	1.01 ± 0.03
head math_integration_benchmark	1.464 ± 0.009	1.454	1.486	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base memory_integration_benchmark	1.140 ± 0.015	1.127	1.181	1.00
head memory_integration_benchmark	1.144 ± 0.013	1.133	1.180	1.00 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.782 ± 0.032	1.760	1.857	1.01 ± 0.02
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.766 ± 0.026	1.748	1.832	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base pedersen	504.7 ± 2.4	501.8	510.3	1.00
head pedersen	513.8 ± 12.0	503.8	533.1	1.02 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base poseidon_integration_benchmark	954.8 ± 33.8	939.3	1050.2	1.00 ± 0.04
head poseidon_integration_benchmark	954.8 ± 10.5	943.6	979.9	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base secp_integration_benchmark	1.718 ± 0.006	1.707	1.724	1.00
head secp_integration_benchmark	1.722 ± 0.011	1.707	1.737	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base set_integration_benchmark	692.8 ± 13.5	684.0	728.7	1.01 ± 0.02
head set_integration_benchmark	685.4 ± 1.2	683.7	687.1	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base uint256_integration_benchmark	3.812 ± 0.131	3.741	4.179	1.01 ± 0.04
head uint256_integration_benchmark	3.787 ± 0.049	3.735	3.895	1.00

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.56198% with 9 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 94.93%. Comparing base (4b17118) to head (a6ed611).

Files	Patch %	Lines
vm/src/types/layout_name.rs	88.57%	4 Missing :warning:
vm/src/vm/runners/cairo_runner.rs	94.54%	3 Missing :warning:
cairo-vm-cli/src/main.rs	50.00%	1 Missing :warning:
cairo1-run/src/main.rs	50.00%	1 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1715 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 94.91% 94.93% +0.02% ========================================== Files 98 99 +1 Lines 38170 38147 -23 ========================================== - Hits 36228 36216 -12 + Misses 1942 1931 -11 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions[bot]]

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**

hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     23.581 s ±  0.043 s    [User: 22.872 s, System: 0.707 s]
  Range (min … max):   23.550 s … 23.611 s    2 runs

Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     23.513 s ±  0.004 s    [User: 22.767 s, System: 0.744 s]
  Range (min … max):   23.510 s … 23.515 s    2 runs

Summary
  'hyper_threading_pr threads: 1' ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than 'hyper_threading_main threads: 1'

hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     12.281 s ±  0.034 s    [User: 23.009 s, System: 0.766 s]
  Range (min … max):   12.257 s … 12.305 s    2 runs

Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     12.253 s ±  0.010 s    [User: 23.091 s, System: 0.696 s]
  Range (min … max):   12.246 s … 12.260 s    2 runs

Summary
  'hyper_threading_pr threads: 2' ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than 'hyper_threading_main threads: 2'

hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.652 s ±  0.239 s    [User: 34.886 s, System: 0.899 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.483 s …  9.821 s    2 runs

Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.759 s ±  0.021 s    [User: 34.549 s, System: 0.887 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.744 s …  9.775 s    2 runs

Summary
  'hyper_threading_main threads: 4' ran
    1.01 ± 0.03 times faster than 'hyper_threading_pr threads: 4'

hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.581 s ±  0.172 s    [User: 34.793 s, System: 0.975 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.460 s …  9.703 s    2 runs

Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.597 s ±  0.070 s    [User: 34.612 s, System: 1.003 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.548 s …  9.647 s    2 runs

Summary
  'hyper_threading_main threads: 6' ran
    1.00 ± 0.02 times faster than 'hyper_threading_pr threads: 6'

hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.604 s ±  0.079 s    [User: 34.899 s, System: 0.957 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.549 s …  9.660 s    2 runs

Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.485 s ±  0.052 s    [User: 34.897 s, System: 0.942 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.448 s …  9.522 s    2 runs

Summary
  'hyper_threading_pr threads: 8' ran
    1.01 ± 0.01 times faster than 'hyper_threading_main threads: 8'

hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.618 s ±  0.194 s    [User: 34.966 s, System: 1.039 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.481 s …  9.755 s    2 runs

Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.616 s ±  0.084 s    [User: 34.908 s, System: 1.040 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.557 s …  9.675 s    2 runs

Summary
  'hyper_threading_pr threads: 16' ran
    1.00 ± 0.02 times faster than 'hyper_threading_main threads: 16'