Add `EXCESS_BALANCE` hint

[fmoletta]

Implements hint:

%{
            from excess_balance import excess_balance_func

            res = excess_balance_func(ids, memory, __dict_manager)

            ids.check_account_value = res["account_value"]
            ids.check_excess_balance = res["excess_balance"]
            ids.check_margin_requirement_d = res["margin_requirement"]
            ids.check_unrealized_pnl_d = res["unrealized_pnl"]
%}

[github-actions[bot]]

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**

hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     26.971 s ±  0.047 s    [User: 26.136 s, System: 0.834 s]
  Range (min … max):   26.938 s … 27.005 s    2 runs

Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     25.208 s ±  0.041 s    [User: 24.474 s, System: 0.732 s]
  Range (min … max):   25.179 s … 25.237 s    2 runs

Summary
  'hyper_threading_pr threads: 1' ran
    1.07 ± 0.00 times faster than 'hyper_threading_main threads: 1'

hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     15.076 s ±  0.033 s    [User: 26.921 s, System: 0.778 s]
  Range (min … max):   15.052 s … 15.099 s    2 runs

Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     14.185 s ±  0.012 s    [User: 25.306 s, System: 0.768 s]
  Range (min … max):   14.176 s … 14.193 s    2 runs

Summary
  'hyper_threading_pr threads: 2' ran
    1.06 ± 0.00 times faster than 'hyper_threading_main threads: 2'

hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.161 s ±  0.169 s    [User: 38.188 s, System: 0.983 s]
  Range (min … max):   11.041 s … 11.280 s    2 runs

Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.435 s ±  0.288 s    [User: 37.480 s, System: 0.975 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.232 s … 10.639 s    2 runs

Summary
  'hyper_threading_pr threads: 4' ran
    1.07 ± 0.03 times faster than 'hyper_threading_main threads: 4'

hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.581 s ±  0.194 s    [User: 38.179 s, System: 1.079 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.444 s … 10.719 s    2 runs

Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.137 s ±  0.164 s    [User: 37.388 s, System: 0.978 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.021 s … 10.253 s    2 runs

Summary
  'hyper_threading_pr threads: 6' ran
    1.04 ± 0.03 times faster than 'hyper_threading_main threads: 6'

hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.612 s ±  0.002 s    [User: 38.541 s, System: 1.091 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.610 s … 10.613 s    2 runs

Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.274 s ±  0.111 s    [User: 37.469 s, System: 0.985 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.196 s … 10.352 s    2 runs

Summary
  'hyper_threading_pr threads: 8' ran
    1.03 ± 0.01 times faster than 'hyper_threading_main threads: 8'

hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.426 s ±  0.142 s    [User: 38.994 s, System: 1.121 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.325 s … 10.526 s    2 runs

Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.996 s ±  0.010 s    [User: 37.866 s, System: 1.058 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.989 s … 10.003 s    2 runs

Summary
  'hyper_threading_pr threads: 16' ran
    1.04 ± 0.01 times faster than 'hyper_threading_main threads: 16'

[github-actions[bot]]

Benchmark Results for unmodified programs :rocket:

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_factorial	2.156 ± 0.082	2.104	2.379	1.08 ± 0.04
head big_factorial	1.998 ± 0.016	1.980	2.025	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_fibonacci	2.055 ± 0.013	2.035	2.073	1.05 ± 0.01
head big_fibonacci	1.958 ± 0.009	1.941	1.969	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.852 ± 0.156	7.675	8.103	1.06 ± 0.02
head blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.402 ± 0.091	7.302	7.555	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base compare_arrays_200000	2.193 ± 0.018	2.157	2.211	1.05 ± 0.02
head compare_arrays_200000	2.087 ± 0.044	2.063	2.210	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base dict_integration_benchmark	1.444 ± 0.016	1.430	1.484	1.04 ± 0.01
head dict_integration_benchmark	1.384 ± 0.009	1.373	1.401	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.262 ± 0.051	1.223	1.401	1.05 ± 0.04
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.202 ± 0.015	1.183	1.225	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base integration_builtins	7.853 ± 0.140	7.655	8.044	1.05 ± 0.02
head integration_builtins	7.446 ± 0.104	7.355	7.677	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base keccak_integration_benchmark	8.270 ± 0.332	7.951	8.917	1.07 ± 0.04
head keccak_integration_benchmark	7.717 ± 0.090	7.582	7.847	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base linear_search	2.153 ± 0.014	2.138	2.182	1.06 ± 0.01
head linear_search	2.040 ± 0.015	2.028	2.077	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.490 ± 0.011	1.474	1.507	1.04 ± 0.02
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.436 ± 0.022	1.420	1.498	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_integration_benchmark	1.479 ± 0.016	1.465	1.521	1.03 ± 0.01
head math_integration_benchmark	1.430 ± 0.009	1.413	1.441	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base memory_integration_benchmark	1.237 ± 0.030	1.217	1.320	1.06 ± 0.03
head memory_integration_benchmark	1.168 ± 0.006	1.158	1.177	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.567 ± 0.006	1.558	1.576	1.04 ± 0.01
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.507 ± 0.008	1.496	1.522	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base pedersen	524.0 ± 1.8	521.4	527.1	1.02 ± 0.00
head pedersen	511.8 ± 1.4	509.9	514.0	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base poseidon_integration_benchmark	767.2 ± 7.1	760.3	783.8	1.03 ± 0.01
head poseidon_integration_benchmark	744.4 ± 3.4	740.5	752.5	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base secp_integration_benchmark	1.845 ± 0.011	1.827	1.862	1.03 ± 0.01
head secp_integration_benchmark	1.788 ± 0.006	1.779	1.797	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base set_integration_benchmark	682.7 ± 15.1	671.9	714.5	1.04 ± 0.02
head set_integration_benchmark	657.5 ± 2.2	654.6	661.5	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base uint256_integration_benchmark	4.431 ± 0.123	4.331	4.752	1.07 ± 0.03
head uint256_integration_benchmark	4.155 ± 0.021	4.122	4.185	1.00

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 97.79338% with 22 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 94.84%. Comparing base (c745ece) to head (b7af6b5).

Files	Patch %	Lines
...processor/builtin_hint_processor/excess_balance.rs	98.67%	13 Missing :warning:
...int_processor/builtin_hint_processor_definition.rs	14.28%	6 Missing :warning:
...t_processor/builtin_hint_processor/dict_manager.rs	57.14%	3 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1777 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 94.77% 94.84% +0.07% ========================================== Files 101 102 +1 Lines 39056 40053 +997 ========================================== + Hits 37015 37990 +975 - Misses 2041 2063 +22 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.