Closed FrancoGiachetta closed 2 months ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 94.79%. Comparing base (
309c8a7
) to head (19a8858
).
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Benchmark Results for unmodified programs :rocket:
Command | Mean [s] | Min [s] | Max [s] | Relative |
---|---|---|---|---|
base big_factorial |
2.035 ± 0.014 | 2.016 | 2.056 | 1.00 |
head big_factorial |
2.065 ± 0.076 | 2.031 | 2.279 | 1.01 ± 0.04 |
Command | Mean [s] | Min [s] | Max [s] | Relative |
---|---|---|---|---|
base big_fibonacci |
2.010 ± 0.098 | 1.961 | 2.283 | 1.01 ± 0.05 |
head big_fibonacci |
1.988 ± 0.025 | 1.969 | 2.054 | 1.00 |
Command | Mean [s] | Min [s] | Max [s] | Relative |
---|---|---|---|---|
base blake2s_integration_benchmark |
7.525 ± 0.201 | 7.322 | 7.986 | 1.00 ± 0.06 |
head blake2s_integration_benchmark |
7.519 ± 0.388 | 7.251 | 8.432 | 1.00 |
Command | Mean [s] | Min [s] | Max [s] | Relative |
---|---|---|---|---|
base compare_arrays_200000 |
2.114 ± 0.017 | 2.086 | 2.134 | 1.00 |
head compare_arrays_200000 |
2.119 ± 0.026 | 2.095 | 2.184 | 1.00 ± 0.01 |
Command | Mean [s] | Min [s] | Max [s] | Relative |
---|---|---|---|---|
base dict_integration_benchmark |
1.366 ± 0.004 | 1.359 | 1.373 | 1.00 |
head dict_integration_benchmark |
1.385 ± 0.022 | 1.364 | 1.438 | 1.01 ± 0.02 |
Command | Mean [s] | Min [s] | Max [s] | Relative |
---|---|---|---|---|
base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark |
1.202 ± 0.013 | 1.189 | 1.234 | 1.01 ± 0.01 |
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark |
1.194 ± 0.011 | 1.182 | 1.213 | 1.00 |
Command | Mean [s] | Min [s] | Max [s] | Relative |
---|---|---|---|---|
base integration_builtins |
7.447 ± 0.110 | 7.309 | 7.643 | 1.00 |
head integration_builtins |
7.486 ± 0.090 | 7.305 | 7.584 | 1.01 ± 0.02 |
Command | Mean [s] | Min [s] | Max [s] | Relative |
---|---|---|---|---|
base keccak_integration_benchmark |
7.688 ± 0.105 | 7.538 | 7.827 | 1.00 |
head keccak_integration_benchmark |
7.965 ± 0.353 | 7.548 | 8.555 | 1.04 ± 0.05 |
Command | Mean [s] | Min [s] | Max [s] | Relative |
---|---|---|---|---|
base linear_search |
2.117 ± 0.023 | 2.096 | 2.170 | 1.00 ± 0.01 |
head linear_search |
2.107 ± 0.021 | 2.083 | 2.149 | 1.00 |
Command | Mean [s] | Min [s] | Max [s] | Relative |
---|---|---|---|---|
base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark |
1.471 ± 0.008 | 1.461 | 1.483 | 1.00 |
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark |
1.490 ± 0.016 | 1.473 | 1.518 | 1.01 ± 0.01 |
Command | Mean [s] | Min [s] | Max [s] | Relative |
---|---|---|---|---|
base math_integration_benchmark |
1.422 ± 0.007 | 1.405 | 1.429 | 1.00 |
head math_integration_benchmark |
1.423 ± 0.009 | 1.417 | 1.448 | 1.00 ± 0.01 |
Command | Mean [s] | Min [s] | Max [s] | Relative |
---|---|---|---|---|
base memory_integration_benchmark |
1.177 ± 0.006 | 1.171 | 1.189 | 1.00 |
head memory_integration_benchmark |
1.178 ± 0.004 | 1.173 | 1.185 | 1.00 ± 0.01 |
Command | Mean [s] | Min [s] | Max [s] | Relative |
---|---|---|---|---|
base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks |
1.541 ± 0.011 | 1.527 | 1.564 | 1.00 |
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks |
1.542 ± 0.013 | 1.529 | 1.571 | 1.00 ± 0.01 |
Command | Mean [ms] | Min [ms] | Max [ms] | Relative |
---|---|---|---|---|
base pedersen |
520.4 ± 2.0 | 518.3 | 524.2 | 1.00 |
head pedersen |
521.6 ± 1.5 | 519.2 | 524.1 | 1.00 ± 0.00 |
Command | Mean [ms] | Min [ms] | Max [ms] | Relative |
---|---|---|---|---|
base poseidon_integration_benchmark |
766.5 ± 2.5 | 762.8 | 769.2 | 1.00 ± 0.01 |
head poseidon_integration_benchmark |
764.6 ± 3.7 | 760.8 | 770.1 | 1.00 |
Command | Mean [s] | Min [s] | Max [s] | Relative |
---|---|---|---|---|
base secp_integration_benchmark |
1.797 ± 0.009 | 1.786 | 1.809 | 1.00 |
head secp_integration_benchmark |
1.802 ± 0.012 | 1.778 | 1.820 | 1.00 ± 0.01 |
Command | Mean [ms] | Min [ms] | Max [ms] | Relative |
---|---|---|---|---|
base set_integration_benchmark |
645.0 ± 2.3 | 641.5 | 647.8 | 1.00 ± 0.00 |
head set_integration_benchmark |
644.6 ± 1.8 | 642.1 | 647.9 | 1.00 |
Command | Mean [s] | Min [s] | Max [s] | Relative |
---|---|---|---|---|
base uint256_integration_benchmark |
4.199 ± 0.065 | 4.121 | 4.347 | 1.00 |
head uint256_integration_benchmark |
4.210 ± 0.130 | 4.097 | 4.570 | 1.00 ± 0.03 |
Changes were done @pefontana
**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**
hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
Time (mean ± σ): 25.512 s ± 0.040 s [User: 24.682 s, System: 0.827 s]
Range (min … max): 25.483 s … 25.540 s 2 runs
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
Time (mean ± σ): 25.583 s ± 0.034 s [User: 24.802 s, System: 0.779 s]
Range (min … max): 25.559 s … 25.607 s 2 runs
Summary
'hyper_threading_main threads: 1' ran
1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than 'hyper_threading_pr threads: 1'
hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
Time (mean ± σ): 14.105 s ± 0.000 s [User: 25.082 s, System: 0.889 s]
Range (min … max): 14.105 s … 14.105 s 2 runs
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
Time (mean ± σ): 14.115 s ± 0.056 s [User: 25.201 s, System: 0.756 s]
Range (min … max): 14.075 s … 14.154 s 2 runs
Summary
'hyper_threading_main threads: 2' ran
1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than 'hyper_threading_pr threads: 2'
hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
Time (mean ± σ): 10.364 s ± 0.104 s [User: 37.748 s, System: 1.034 s]
Range (min … max): 10.290 s … 10.437 s 2 runs
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
Time (mean ± σ): 10.650 s ± 0.492 s [User: 37.479 s, System: 0.986 s]
Range (min … max): 10.302 s … 10.998 s 2 runs
Summary
'hyper_threading_main threads: 4' ran
1.03 ± 0.05 times faster than 'hyper_threading_pr threads: 4'
hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
Time (mean ± σ): 10.573 s ± 0.225 s [User: 37.749 s, System: 1.010 s]
Range (min … max): 10.414 s … 10.732 s 2 runs
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
Time (mean ± σ): 10.367 s ± 0.167 s [User: 37.703 s, System: 1.041 s]
Range (min … max): 10.249 s … 10.485 s 2 runs
Summary
'hyper_threading_pr threads: 6' ran
1.02 ± 0.03 times faster than 'hyper_threading_main threads: 6'
hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
Time (mean ± σ): 10.446 s ± 0.175 s [User: 37.995 s, System: 0.998 s]
Range (min … max): 10.322 s … 10.569 s 2 runs
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
Time (mean ± σ): 10.310 s ± 0.001 s [User: 38.184 s, System: 1.005 s]
Range (min … max): 10.310 s … 10.311 s 2 runs
Summary
'hyper_threading_pr threads: 8' ran
1.01 ± 0.02 times faster than 'hyper_threading_main threads: 8'
hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
Time (mean ± σ): 10.337 s ± 0.147 s [User: 38.379 s, System: 1.115 s]
Range (min … max): 10.233 s … 10.441 s 2 runs
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
Time (mean ± σ): 10.458 s ± 0.215 s [User: 38.196 s, System: 1.082 s]
Range (min … max): 10.306 s … 10.609 s 2 runs
Summary
'hyper_threading_main threads: 16' ran
1.01 ± 0.03 times faster than 'hyper_threading_pr threads: 16'
@FrancoGiachetta Put the "Tests" label to the PR so the changelog check doesn't fail
I'm not sure this was broken in the first place, though I failed to document properly how it works. make test
produces coverage data, what make coverage
currently does is consolidate it into a report we can upload to codecov.io. That's so we can run the different features in parallel in the CI. The original way took us a long time for each PR.
Is this no longer working?
Hi! The idea behind this change is so that we can run make coverage
without the need to run make test
before that. It also changes the args passed to the command, mainly to change the output's format.
Change coverage command
Description
This PR changes make coverage command so that it executes the following command:
cargo llvm-cov --html --workspace --features "test_utils, cairo-1-hints"
Checklist