laminas / laminas-captcha

Generate and validate CAPTCHAs using Figlets, images, ReCaptcha, and more
https://docs.laminas.dev/laminas-captcha/
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
24 stars 13 forks source link

Update dependency laminas/laminas-coding-standard to ~2.3.0 #23

Closed renovate[bot] closed 2 years ago

renovate[bot] commented 2 years ago

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
laminas/laminas-coding-standard (source) require-dev minor ~2.1.4 -> ~2.3.0

Release Notes

laminas/laminas-coding-standard ### [`v2.3.0`](https://togithub.com/laminas/laminas-coding-standard/releases/tag/2.3.0) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/laminas/laminas-coding-standard/compare/2.2.1...2.3.0) ##### Release Notes for [2.3.0](https://togithub.com/laminas/laminas-coding-standard/milestone/12) Feature release (minor) ##### 2.3.0 - Total issues resolved: **0** - Total pull requests resolved: **1** - Total contributors: **1** ##### Enhancement - [67: feat: upgrade to slevomat/coding-standard 7 with enhanced PHP 8 support](https://togithub.com/laminas/laminas-coding-standard/pull/67) thanks to [@​geerteltink](https://togithub.com/geerteltink) ### [`v2.2.1`](https://togithub.com/laminas/laminas-coding-standard/releases/tag/2.2.1) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/laminas/laminas-coding-standard/compare/2.2.0...2.2.1) ##### Release Notes for [2.2.1](https://togithub.com/laminas/laminas-coding-standard/milestone/11) 2.2.x bugfix release (patch) ##### 2.2.1 - Total issues resolved: **0** - Total pull requests resolved: **2** - Total contributors: **1** ##### Bug - [65: Exclude declare strict types below comment](https://togithub.com/laminas/laminas-coding-standard/pull/65) thanks to [@​ghostwriter](https://togithub.com/ghostwriter) ##### Enhancement - [64: Normalize composer](https://togithub.com/laminas/laminas-coding-standard/pull/64) thanks to [@​ghostwriter](https://togithub.com/ghostwriter) ### [`v2.2.0`](https://togithub.com/laminas/laminas-coding-standard/releases/tag/2.2.0) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/laminas/laminas-coding-standard/compare/2.1.4...2.2.0) ##### Release Notes for [2.2.0](https://togithub.com/laminas/laminas-coding-standard/milestone/5) Feature release (minor) ##### 2.2.0 - Total issues resolved: **1** - Total pull requests resolved: **7** - Total contributors: **4** ##### Documentation - [63: docs: remove changelog once again](https://togithub.com/laminas/laminas-coding-standard/pull/63) thanks to [@​geerteltink](https://togithub.com/geerteltink) - [62: docs: fix markdown formatting](https://togithub.com/laminas/laminas-coding-standard/pull/62) thanks to [@​geerteltink](https://togithub.com/geerteltink) ##### Bug - [61: fix: update composer lockfile](https://togithub.com/laminas/laminas-coding-standard/pull/61) thanks to [@​geerteltink](https://togithub.com/geerteltink) ##### Enhancement - [60: Switch to GHA CI workflow](https://togithub.com/laminas/laminas-coding-standard/pull/60) thanks to [@​internalsystemerror](https://togithub.com/internalsystemerror) - [59: Remove file headers](https://togithub.com/laminas/laminas-coding-standard/pull/59) thanks to [@​ghostwriter](https://togithub.com/ghostwriter) - [58: Remove laminas-zendframework-bridge.](https://togithub.com/laminas/laminas-coding-standard/pull/58) thanks to [@​Danack](https://togithub.com/Danack) - [51: Drop support for PHP less than 7.3](https://togithub.com/laminas/laminas-coding-standard/pull/51) thanks to [@​geerteltink](https://togithub.com/geerteltink)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled due to failing status checks.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.



Read more information about the use of Renovate Bot within Laminas.

renovate[bot] commented 2 years ago

Branch automerge failure

This PR was configured for branch automerge, however this is not possible so it has been raised as a PR instead.