Guess this hasn't been updated to the new TVR structure yet? The tutorial feels a bit random given that the "birds eye" tutorial uses real data. Given that this is a use-case and not a tutorial anymore (technically), I was wondering whether this one should be a clear continuation of the birds eye one with the Schmitt dataset? Is there a way to make this work?
[ ] "Here, we’ll take an analysts-centric view of typical file transformations." -> What makes that view different? We could consider explaining this in 0.5 sentences
[ ] This requires more explanation. Why do we need Features here? "bucket the labels" might be technically correct, but it is too technical for a guide.
[ ] Could consider specifying that this is a mask. Common in the Python world I think
[ ] Shouldn't we be creating the records from the subset here?
https://lamin.ai/docs/analysis-flow
Guess this hasn't been updated to the new TVR structure yet? The tutorial feels a bit random given that the "birds eye" tutorial uses real data. Given that this is a use-case and not a tutorial anymore (technically), I was wondering whether this one should be a clear continuation of the birds eye one with the Schmitt dataset? Is there a way to make this work?