Closed falexwolf closed 1 month ago
I keep iterating through different versions
This is where I am right now
And here with types
@falexwolf cool! Feels much more reduced.
I wonder whether should keep the '
given that in the case of experimental_factors
they are super distracting because some 10x assays also contain '
in their names. I know that we want to keep colors minimal, but maybe just highlighting the ,
would serve as better separators than the much more cluttering '
?
Yes, legitimate! Let me make another big change, and then we'll discuss polishing!
Attention: Patch coverage is 86.41115%
with 39 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 89.42%. Comparing base (
18f3374
) to head (5f66748
). Report is 12 commits behind head on main.:exclamation: Current head 5f66748 differs from pull request most recent head 7b74ee8
Please upload reports for the commit 7b74ee8 to get more accurate results.
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
lamindb/core/_feature_manager.py | 83.49% | 17 Missing :warning: |
lamindb/core/_data.py | 66.66% | 8 Missing :warning: |
lamindb/core/_label_manager.py | 87.50% | 6 Missing :warning: |
lamindb/_finish.py | 84.84% | 5 Missing :warning: |
lamindb/_collection.py | 50.00% | 3 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
🚀 Deployed on https://665205c334c0686c35779d10--lamindb-qnwk.netlify.app
ln.track()
returnsrun
.describe()
lamin save
create
flag in.from_values()