search

lamps-wg / RFC5019bis

Use of SHA-256 for CertID
Other
0 stars 1 forks source link

Wg draft00v2 #42

Closed tadahik closed 12 months ago

tadahik commented 12 months ago

Addressed Rob's comment. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/OWDDnWVnSrCq27n5qSQk9nBiS9c/

I favour option #2, if it's found to be widely compatible with existing clients. To address that point, and add "For instance..."

We may mention this use of User-Agent sniffing to determine client capabilities in passing in the draft. Good idea. It seems not profile matter, but protocol matter, so I did not made change.

Addressed Russ's comment https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/qtTbW5DPDMbYqDJ5h8CGMxn1QMM/