Is the "CMS KEMRecipientInfo Processing Summary" section needed? Both Mike and Carl pointed this out during review. It is basically a less complete version of section 2 from cms-kemri.
I added the section because rfc5990bis also has this section. I will see if Russ wants to remove it from rfc5990bis or if there's justification to keep it there (and here).
Is the "CMS KEMRecipientInfo Processing Summary" section needed? Both Mike and Carl pointed this out during review. It is basically a less complete version of section 2 from cms-kemri.
I added the section because rfc5990bis also has this section. I will see if Russ wants to remove it from rfc5990bis or if there's justification to keep it there (and here).