search

lamps-wg / draft-composite-sigs

IETF Internet-Draft about X.509 certificates with composite keys and signatures.
Other
3 stars 1 forks source link

SHA256withECDSA vs ECDSAwithSHA256 #14

Closed danvangeest closed 4 months ago

danvangeest commented 5 months ago

I'm curious why in the "Composite Signature Algorithms" table, SHA256withECDSA for example is used instead of ECDSAwithSHA256? Isn't the latter more commonly used terminology?

johngray-dev commented 4 months ago

In July 3rd, Jan said he would update the table.

janklaussner commented 4 months ago

updated the naming in the table in PR#16

johngray-dev commented 4 months ago

Confirmed that Jan resolved this in #16