Missed issues about "Power Users" (trunk version)

lamps1 / windows-privesc-check

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/windows-privesc-check

GNU General Public License v2.0

0 stars 0 forks source link

Missed issues about "Power Users" (trunk version) #2

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

"Power Users" were granted powerful permissions to some areas of the file 
system.  wpc reported no issues about "Power Users".

Original issue reported on code.google.com by pentestm...@googlemail.com on 10 Oct 2011 at 7:03

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

This is a feature.  If "Power Users" is empty, then wpc ignores it as any 
issues would not be exploitable.

While this is what pentesters would want, I guess auditors might want the 
opposite.  I'll make it optional at some stage.

Original comment by pentestm...@googlemail.com on 10 Oct 2011 at 7:12