search

lancaster-university / microbit-v2-samples

CODAL build tools and sample programs for the micro:bit v2.x
MIT License
68 stars 88 forks source link

Remove `NO_BLE` from codal.json if it's not used anywhere. #43

Closed carlosperate closed 1 year ago

carlosperate commented 2 years ago

Had a search through the micro:bit CODAL repos I couldn't find any usage of the NO_BLE define. If it's not used anywhere we should remove it from the codal.json file: https://github.com/lancaster-university/microbit-v2-samples/blob/ac325c50b5b13ff0b3355ac8b495bcc1ba2c2853/codal.json#L10-L11

microbit-carlos commented 2 years ago

There is also SOFTDEVICE_PRESENT, which looks like it might be already defined in target.json

https://github.com/lancaster-university/microbit-v2-samples/blob/ac325c50b5b13ff0b3355ac8b495bcc1ba2c2853/codal.ble.json#L10-L11

https://github.com/lancaster-university/codal-microbit-v2/blob/6e880bc3d10df1a585bb9046ee4ab02bdcab1f34/target.json?q=SOFTDEVICE_PRESENT#L48

Can setting "SOFTDEVICE_PRESENT": 0 in the JSON file remove this definition from the build? If not, we might want to either add that feature, to habilitate CODAL builds without a SoftDevice, or remove it from the target.ble.json example file.

As a side note, the SoftDevice might be used by CODAL for other things apart from BLE, for example the internal nRF52 temperature sensor could be read using the SD, so that could also be a dependency on it.

microbit-carlos commented 2 years ago

And if possible we might also want to merge DEVICE_BLE and MICROBIT_BLE_ENABLED? : https://github.com/lancaster-university/microbit-v2-samples/blob/ac325c50b5b13ff0b3355ac8b495bcc1ba2c2853/codal.ble.json#L10-L13

microbit-carlos commented 1 year ago

Removed in cb9278e2ddf4c827547470adbd4973ce1502ae4f.