Open landam opened 5 years ago
Comment by neteler on 5 May 2016 14:08 UTC Milestone renamed
Comment by neteler on 28 Dec 2016 15:04 UTC Ticket retargeted after milestone closed
Modified by @landam on 5 May 2017 20:40 UTC
Modified by @landam on 18 Jul 2017 13:28 UTC
Comment by mlennert on 19 Jul 2017 13:14 UTC Replying to [ticket:2788 martinl]:
It would be nice to implement
r.export
andv.export
similarly to https://grass.osgeo.org/grass77/manuals/r.import and G7:v.export. These modules would callr.out.gdal
/v.out.ogr
and then reproject output files to defined crs. I can see several scenarious: .html>
- add to
r.out.gdal
andv.out.ogr
new parameteroutput_crs
, reprojection will be done by GDAL- create new temporary location in output crs, reproject data (
r|v.proj
) and then export- export data to temporary output file and then to reproject by GDAL
It seems that 2) fits in the best way to the current
r.import
andv.import
approach.
+1
I think this option is best as it will allow to use the known v./r.proj reprojection options.
Moritz
Comment by neteler on 26 Jan 2018 11:40 UTC Ticket retargeted after milestone closed
Modified by neteler on 12 Jun 2018 20:48 UTC
Modified by @landam on 25 Aug 2018 16:02 UTC
Comment by @landam on 25 Jan 2019 21:07 UTC Ticket retargeted after milestone closed
Reported by @landam on 29 Oct 2015 16:07 UTC It would be nice to implement
r.export
andv.export
similarly to https://grass.osgeo.org/grass77/manuals/r.import and G7:v.export. These modules would callr.out.gdal
/v.out.ogr
and then reproject output files to defined crs. I can see several scenarious: .html1. add tor.out.gdal
andv.out.ogr
new parameteroutput_crs
, reprojection will be done by GDALr|v.proj
) and then exportIt seems that 2) fits in the best way to the current
r.import
andv.import
approach. Any options?GRASS GIS version and provenance
svn-trunk
Migrated-From: https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2788