DOC: some import statement of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Generative AI can be improved

[shukawam]

Issue with current documentation:

There is a point of improvement in the import statement included in the following sample code that exists in the Usage.

from langchain_community.llms import OCIGenAI

from langchain_community.llms import OCIGenAI

# use default authN method API-key
llm = OCIGenAI(
    model_id="MY_MODEL",
    service_endpoint="https://inference.generativeai.us-chicago-1.oci.oraclecloud.com",
    compartment_id="MY_OCID",
)

response = llm.invoke("Tell me one fact about earth", temperature=0.7)
print(response)

This is a point as well.

from langchain_community.vectorstores import FAISS

from langchain.schema.output_parser import StrOutputParser
from langchain.schema.runnable import RunnablePassthrough
from langchain_community.embeddings import OCIGenAIEmbeddings
from langchain_community.vectorstores import FAISS

Idea or request for content:

The first item is appropriate to do this.

from langchain_community.llms.oci_generative_ai import OCIGenAI

And the second item is appropriate to do this.

from langchain_community.vectorstores.faiss import FAISS

[dosubot[bot]]

🤖

It's great to see that you've identified the issue with the import statements and even provided the corrected versions. Your proposed changes will definitely improve the documentation. I encourage you to go ahead and create a pull request with your suggested fixes. Your contribution will be valuable to the community. Thank you for your willingness to improve the repository!

---

This response is meant to be useful and save you time. It is not meant to be a precise solution, but rather a starting point for your own research.

Help me be more useful! Please leave a 👍 if this is helpful and 👎 if it is irrelevant.

If you want to continue the conversation, start your reply with @dosu-bot.

[PennlaineChu]

I have changed the document, however, both the original code and the code you provided works in my case. Can you explain what the problem is with the existing module, please?

[baskaryan]

Yea not clear what the improvement is. Closing issue for now but feel free to re-open if i'm missing something @shukawam