Open ldorigo opened 4 months ago
@nfcampos @efriis @hinthornw (just mentioning random maintainers from memory): might I recommend against just having a bot randomly closing issues that haven't been solved with no reason and no human oversight? I understand you're a popular library and need to manage issues somehow, but it's a slap in the face to people who take the time to identify and report issues. (And in some cases like this one, I believe the problem/question is still there)
Will speak with them.
I'm assuming you're talking about the LangChainTracer, EvaluatorCallbackHandler, and the Run objects?
They're the dataset record ID used during evals. Marking an example_id on a trace/run associates it with that entry
Ya we should improve the docstring
Checklist
Issue with current documentation:
Classes in the BaseTracer hierarchy take a "example_id" parameter. The docstring/api docs have a very vague description of "The example ID associated with the runs.". What is this supposed to be (for)?
Idea or request for content:
No response