Chapter 3 feedback

[ColesNicholas]

Great chapter. Few minor issues I noticed:

• The phrasing in Footnote 3 seemed odd to me. Maybe say “One of the authors of this textbook was a student in the course that year!”

• There is a typo in this sentence, which can be corrected by adding the following bolded letter: "The others yielded smaller effects that were not significant in the replication sample.

• The following citation is rendering in a way that's listing Nosek's full name. I suspect that the other references list the name slightly differently, which could be why it's rendering differently. “Furthermore, the replication effect will be on average 53% as large (Brian A. Nosek et al., 2021).”

• In the analytic flexibility accident report, the Beatle’s song is not written correctly. It should say “When I'm Sixty-Four”. 64 is not written out as a number in the song title.

• This claim seems like an oversimplification: “The open science movement is a response – really a set of responses – to the challenges of reproducibility and replicability.” There was an open science movement pre-replication crisis, and the open science movement existed in disciplines that haven't grappled with a substantial replication crisis. I recommend you change to "he open science movement is, in part, a set of responses to the challenges..."

This in-text reference for the umbrella figure is not rendering properly: Here's what it looked like when I reviewed the chapter “…broader open scholarship) movement is a broad umbrella (Figure @(fig:replication-umbrella))”

Overall: great work!

[mcfrank]

thanks for the feedback, corrected these